Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: Happy Days, It's Back

  1. #21

    Sponsored Ad
    Remove ads and support BladeForums.com!


    Novak's FBI Model Right???? I remember reading/drooling about it in Handguns or G&A in the 90's!!! Wanted one Sooo Baaaad after seeing the stippling/texturing on the topstrap and gripframe/MSH!!! How does she shoot???? We need a couple more pics of that one please!!! Beautiful Pistol Sir!!!

    I ended up with a SA Operator and it too has the now discontinued bar-dot sights with the raised catch on the front edge of the rear sight, videki short trigger, Ed Brown "Wedge" MSH and full Melonite job from Coal Creek Armory. It was a great duty gun when I worked at my last agency (Have to carry "fantastic plastic" now)...


    Oh and....

    Please put my name down for a DCBB Blk-G10 SAR7!!!! Looks GREAT!!!!!


    Stump

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    931
    Originally posted by Jaxx:
    Nice SAR 7, Skunker! ...And that pistol ain't bad either...
    Looks like Jaxx spotted it first. That SAR7 thingaling is the bomb and the handgun ain't bad, either !
    "All Hail the Magic Blade" - Jello Biafra.
    WANTED - NMSFNO in MUDDY with Tan Micarta.

  3. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by OldPhysics View Post
    Alright, Skunk. Don't make me break out the Professional Tools.

    If I have to mensurate that pic tonight, there'll be heck to pay.
    I did earlier. I roughly measured the handle / blade ratio of a pic of my SAR 6 and got ~1.48. I measured the one in his pic and got a ratio of ~1.43. Factoring in parallax I figured it was about the same as my SAR 6. I calculated that if the handle length was the same as a SAR 6, the SAR 7 would have a ratio of ~1.85. So I thought it was a SAR 6.

    I was going to measure the Novak and compare next but then RussMo pointed out the lack of jimping, so I did not bother. The company store shows SAR 6 #13 with jimping. Now there is a slight drop on the spine on this "new" one so it could be that Skunk had his 6 modified but the pattern on the scales also looks different and the grind at the choil and ricasso. So I guess it is not completely unreasonable to assume this is a SAR 7.

    Some of the more experienced eyes seemed to have spotted it without all the measuring.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Mashed Cat, Idaho
    Posts
    19,696
    Quote Originally Posted by l2lku2 View Post
    handle / blade ratio of a pic of my SAR 6 and got ~1.48. ratio of ~1.43. Factoring in parallax I calculated that if the handle length was the of ~1.85. So I thought it was the Novak and compare next but then RussMo pointed out the lack of jimping, #13 with a slight drop on the spine on this "new" one so it could be that Skunk had his 6 modified but the pattern on the scales also looks at the choil and ricasso. So I guess it is completely unreasonable to assume this is a SAR 7.

    Some of the more experienced eyes seemed to have spotted it without all the measuring.
    +1




    .

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    931
    lol. Some might agree there is no need to assume - the pic is there. As well - I am hold ing my SAR6 LE up to screen and I believe the the pictured knife is not a SAR6 LE - the proportions are out.....oh well.
    "All Hail the Magic Blade" - Jello Biafra.
    WANTED - NMSFNO in MUDDY with Tan Micarta.

  6. #26

    Sponsored Ad
    Remove ads and support BladeForums.com!
    iS A puRe beauty. you said ("+14") 7 + 7? "17 years ago"? lots of 7s....Humm....me likes...

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •