Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Unusual HRC number for B-card of Large Sebenza 21?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Taipei,Taiwan
    Posts
    531

    Unusual HRC number for B-card of Large Sebenza 21?


    ADVERTISEMENT
    I got one brand new large Sebenza 21 from US dealer and found maybe an interesting thing,
    the HRC number on B-card is "S35VN 55-57 RC".
    I don't know if this is a typo or CRK really offers large Sebenza 21 with blade for hardness like this.
    My small Sebenza 21 and large Insingo all have B-card with 58-59 RC wrote down.

    I really don't worry at all for the performance of my new large Sebenza 21, just thought this would be a fun to check it out.

    Have you ever had the same experience like this?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,312
    Definitely warrant's asking as that is quite different from the norm. Hopefully Chris will chime in with the answer.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,661
    Error? 55-57 sounds like the hardness of all Chris Reeve's fixed blade knives except for the Nyala.

  4. #4
    Just checked my small micarta 21, 58-59... Maybe just a mistake.....topo...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    2,474
    55-57 in S35VN that's the hardness of my PS, not the sebenza
    typo maybe? probably yes

    doubt they did HT it wrong

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Land of the Bean & the Cod
    Posts
    6,711
    Almost certainly right. There was some discussion about a 55-57 range on the early Umnus here recently. Mr Reeve posted that the cards had been filled out incorrectly, and that there was no change/difference in the Rc range. I'd bet that it's a brainfart..after doing a bunch of the GBs, Pacifics, etc., it'd be easy to keep writing 55-57. How many of us are still writing "2011" on checks???

    Quote Originally Posted by Mad_Maxx View Post
    55-57 in S35VN that's the hardness of my PS, not the sebenza
    typo maybe? probably yes

    doubt they did HT it wrong

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by JNewell View Post
    Almost certainly right. There was some discussion about a 55-57 range on the early Umnus here recently. Mr Reeve posted that the cards had been filled out incorrectly, and that there was no change/difference in the Rc range. I'd bet that it's a brainfart..after doing a bunch of the GBs, Pacifics, etc., it'd be easy to keep writing 55-57. How many of us are still writing "2011" on checks???
    Whoa, what the hell is a check, some kind of debit card you write on?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •