
Originally Posted by
razorsdescent
i'm not a huge fan of non-violent protests in civilized areas. If something is wrong enough that you feel the need to march en masse you should also feel that you have the right to defend yourself. Just look at some of the riots in greece, you saw guys in what approximates to civilian riot gear. They got their point accross and they werent harmed, nor were they overly blood thirsty. I just think that a complete commital to non-violence is a terrible tactic. If ghandi had the man power and arms he wouldn't have gone the non-violent route (granted people argue the point to this day, but he stated that disarming people was unethical).
Grow some spine if you believe that strongly, otherwise your among the likes of westboro baptist church. I think one of the reasons this country has gotten so bad is that no one knows how to make a meaningful protest anymore.
Bookmarks