My brief comments in blue;
I don't have enough information to know who was in the wrong here so I won't pretend to. MAYBE Zimmerman deserves to burn for this, or maybe he was justified in his actions, I don't know so I won't plead his case OR Martin's either way... I do think it fair and necessary however, to consider BOTH sides of the story as plausible.
Originally Posted by MJF
Pro 26:4 Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him.
Pro 26:5 Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceit.