Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 37 of 37

Thread: Better Steel on XM-18's

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    My private asylum - in the Netherlands
    Posts
    3,090
    Blog Entries
    2

    Sponsored Ad
    Remove ads and support BladeForums.com!
    I bought my XM-18 from a guy who now owns an XHP one. He says he liked his previous one better (20CV). Just anecdotal, but there you are. According to the interactive steel chart at zknives.com, 20CV is identical to M390. I remember it surprised a lot of guys when I first mentioned that. M390 was all the rave (and rightly so) and 20CV had been in use on the XM-18 for quite a while before Spyderco and Benchmade started using M390. I guess 20CV just sounds so nondescript. But it's a supersteel alright.
    Obama is America's first Affirmative Action president!!
    Anonymous


  2. #22
    Sure its a super steel, just check the cutting tests of Jdavis882 with a 20CV Microtech Socom Elite....he was very surprised how well it holds an edge.

    Microtech already used 20CV in the LCC about 10 years ago, so its not that new, it was a very good choice to use it for the XM-18's.

    Since the XM-24 is also more of a "field knife" if you can call it that way, I can also understand the choice of CTS-XHP and S35VN, anyway they are all great steels.


    Last edited by emel; 05-20-2012 at 07:10 AM.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Northeast US
    Posts
    778
    I think the two steel that Hinderer are using now is the best. S35VN and Duratech 20CV

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Chula Vista CA
    Posts
    186
    Emel., you are right, I just edit my post, that Fieldtac of yours really rocks
    [COLOR="#FF0000"]WTB Hinderer Fieldtac Spanto

  5. #25
    Yes the Fieldtac is awesome, here is his little friend the FXM in Duratech 20CV, actually its a very big chunk of 20CV, the blade is at .190” thicker than the XM-18 (.165") and the XM-24 (.185”)


  6. #26
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Chula Vista CA
    Posts
    186
    If you ever think of depart from those "too beefy knives" I´m first on the line
    [COLOR="#FF0000"]WTB Hinderer Fieldtac Spanto

  7. #27
    I never said they were too beefy and that line you wanted to go first on is already very long, to quote the late Charlton Heston "from my cold dead hands"

    Here are some family shots of those "too beefy knives" for size comparisons, enjoy

    Last edited by emel; 05-20-2012 at 03:24 PM.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Chula Vista CA
    Posts
    186
    I just commit a capital sin "big time envy"
    [COLOR="#FF0000"]WTB Hinderer Fieldtac Spanto

  9. #29
    I have a 3.5 gen 3 flipper, spanto. Is there anyway to tell which steel i have. It has a stonewash finish.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    2,592
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Bob45 View Post
    I have a 3.5 gen 3 flipper, spanto. Is there anyway to tell which steel i have. It has a stonewash finish.
    If it is not marked, it is Duratech 20CV.

    "If you're going through hell, keep going." -Winston Churchill

  11. #31
    Quote Originally Posted by Bob45 View Post
    I have a 3.5 gen 3 flipper, spanto. Is there anyway to tell which steel i have. It has a stonewash finish.
    Most likely if unmarked it is Duratech 20CV. CTS-XHP are usually marked as such. This topic has been discussed several times. Search a bit and confirm what you have as I may be mistaken.
    Last edited by Need2Know; 05-23-2012 at 09:30 PM. Reason: mistake

  12. #32
    Quote Originally Posted by DrOpPoInT1110 View Post
    If it is not marked, it is Duratech 20CV.
    What he said.

  13. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    2,592
    Blog Entries
    1
    Emel, those fixed blades are awesome! How do you like the Fieldtac? I saw one at this years ECCKS and it looked great.

    "If you're going through hell, keep going." -Winston Churchill

  14. #34
    Like all hand ground Hinderers it has a very nice grind, great ergo's and balance and the "working finish" suits the knife really well.

    Here you see how thick it is at .235"



    Last edited by emel; 05-24-2012 at 02:34 AM.

  15. #35
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    2,592
    Blog Entries
    1
    Man, that thing is just plain cool. Enjoy it!

    "If you're going through hell, keep going." -Winston Churchill

  16. #36
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    1,424
    Quote Originally Posted by emel View Post
    I am a bit surprised CTS-XHP should be easier to sharpen than 20CV, Duratech 20CV is basically as wear resistant as M390, while CTS-XHP is a tougher steel similar to D2 but more rust resistant ??

    Here is an old thread about XHP vs 20CV : http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/sh...ech-20CV/page3
    Perhaps it is due to the edge geometry of the two more so than the steel. The 3.5" was much more obtuse from the factory and didn't have near as steep or fine of an edge as the 3" XM (by design I'm sure). Maybe that is what prevented me from being able to keep it as sharp.
    -Matt
    13stripsofbacon

  17. #37

    Sponsored Ad
    Remove ads and support BladeForums.com!
    If you use a Spyderco Sharpmaker with only ceramic stones, the edge geometry of some knives could take some or a lot of time before you even hit the apex of the edge, especially on those super steels.

    I once tried to sharpen a M390 Benchmade on the Sharpmaker ceramics and it took almost forever before actually I hit the edge

    But with the diamond stones on my Wicked Edge I can sharpen any of those steels razor sharp really quick and easy.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •