That is a bit of a circular argument. To me, a tool has utility when it is able to accomplish a task with the fewest number of moving parts, least likelihood of failure, cheapest to buy, cheapest to maintain, usable in the most number of expected environments, and relatively ergonomic. Anything past that is simply what we "like". It no longer adds utility, but rather, makes us happy. Aesthetics, novelty, who knows. When you look at the overall cost of an OTF auto, a disproportionate amount of money goes into the part of the knife that doesn't do any cutting. Almost no utility is gained despite increased overall cost and complexity.
Regarding the topic of self defense, I was speaking in terms of utility again. You may be able to end a fight simply by deploying your knife. Lots of pomp and circumstance of a noisy blade popping out add tremendously to the theater of the interaction leading up to the actual fight. Utility is gained as that OTF auto was able to increase your odds of winning a fight.




Reply With Quote

Bookmarks