Keep in mind i never said i didn't like the .38 j frames. I do like them and i am looking at them, i just want to further explore all other options.
Isn't it up to the individual to decide what level of insurance to carry? As long as that individual is aware of the pros and cons of their decision? I personally think that over penetration can be a liability, especially for a private citizen. LE is protected from civil suits and criminal suits to a much greater extent than private citizens. Having a round go through a 6" sill plate, a couple of doors and into a neighbor will cost you. So for specific scenerios your position creates an advantage, for other scenerios a liability.
More in line with the OPs question, the 32 H&R Mag will give lower level 38 special performance out of revolvers chambered for it. If you find a little DA chambered for the round I think it deserves consideration.
Keep in mind i never said i didn't like the .38 j frames. I do like them and i am looking at them, i just want to further explore all other options.
Years ago I had a M36 "Chiefs Special". It was a nice little pistol. I don't think you would go wrong with any of the Smith's.
So we should all carry mouseguns because of civil liablity? I do agree that civil suits are a consideration one has to make. It's one of the reasons why I harp on training: if you've spent time and money to train with those who know what they're doing and talking about (Vickers, Hackathorn, and their peers, for example), then you have more ammo (pardon the pun) for dealing with legal action. "Councillor, based upon the training that I have recieved from accredited individuals and organizations, I precieved a threat and responded with the force my training told me was appropriate." Ditto weapon and ammo selection. "Councillor, the pistol I was carrying and used at the time of the incident is a common weapon in the hands of police and the ammuniton in said pistol is issued by multiple police departments across the country."
You're right that it is the individual's choice in the end, but that won't stop me from making a strong recommendation for the weapon that has been THE back up weapon of choice of police for decades and a round that was THE police round for nearly a century. Also, NAA minis are nearly the same price as a .38 J-frame (about 100-150 bucks difference, not that much as far as guns go) so why NOT go with the gun that's easier to fight with?
Okay, your both right, the NAA mini is much easier to carry and the j frame in 38+p is a more effective fighting pistol. And a j frame is probably what im gonna go with, that or a charter in .44 special when they come out with the classic model. I would get one of the mini's but i already have one. Enough with the pissing contest, you both know alot you just have different opinions. Doesn't mean any ones wronger than any one else. Thank you both for your time and advice, it was very helpful, and thanks to everyone else to.
The NAA standard minis come with smooth rosewood grips. These can be replaced with checkered walnut, textured rubber, or stag. Rubber birdshead or slip-on grips are available for about $15 from NAA or on eBay and are a good investment. You will not experience flip with those. Be sure to get the right size, as the short, LR, and magnum all have different sized frames. The PUG, Black Widow, and Mini Master can all accept standard magnum frame grips.
I have a pair of Black Widows, one with stag and one with compact rubber birdshead grips. The heavier frame and unfluted cylinder reduce felt recoil considerable compared to a standard mini with 1 1/8" barrel.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks