1. Welcome to the New & Improved BladeForums. New software info here. Please report problems in Tech Support, and read existing threads before posting! - Spark
  2. I've changed the default forum style to Flat Awesome based on feedback. Don't like it? Click here to change how the forums look Feedback on this is welcome here.

LMF firesteels compared Army, Scout, Mini

Discussion in 'Outdoor Gear, Survival Equipment & More' started by spike22, Mar 20, 2013.

  1. spike22

    spike22

    34
    Jun 23, 2003
    Hey guys

    I've had the Army model fire steel by Light My Fire for a while, and find it a good piece of kit.

    I value compact and lightweight items for a bug out bag though, and wanted to see how the Scout and Mini models by LMF compared, as they are smaller/lighter.

    I've seen some pics on the forum, but wanted to show some side-by-side pics below to compare size and thickness of ferro rods between the models. Plus if you love bug out gear as much as me, it is basically just eye-candy..

    [​IMG]

    From the left: Army, Scout, Mini.

    [​IMG]

    Ruler here for scale. The Scout and Mini are about the same length.

    [​IMG]

    The Army is a fair bit thicker, which means it will last for more strikes, but it weighs more in your survival kit.

    5firesteels.jpg

    Also on attached pic are the Sparkie and Ranger which I reviewed for Issue 7 of SKM, but found some problems with them.

    I will be field testing the striker from the Mini on the ferro rod of the Ranger, as the Ranger is light and compact - I just found the strikers to be more effective on the LMF models.

    For the record,weights are: Army 2oz/54g , Scout 1.1oz/29g , Mini 0.5oz/14g

    Spike
     

Share This Page