Okay, okay. I'm relatively new to the forum, but I decided to test a "lightweight" BM axis lock (the 943) against an Endura 4 lockback using repeated high impact spine to edge whacks. I've read everywhere that the axis lock is both reliable and strong, particularly under static loads. I'm guessing that most would agree that it takes a heavier static load to cause the 943 axis lock to fail than the Endura 4, which is heavy duty rated by Sal & Company. This said, my hypothesis is that under repeated, high impact spine to edge whacks (each of which do not come close to the reaching the static load failure level) the lockback would perform better because the axis lock would be prone to "rattling" and "inching" back slightly with each whack, which could ultimately cause a failure.
During my test, I whacked each knife rapidly against a concrete wall 30 times in a timed 30 secs. While neither knife failed, by the end of the test, the 943's lock bar was slanted heavily toward one side (as if one pulled back on the lock bar with the thumb but not the index finger). The Endura showed no difference.
I don't know what this means, if anything. Any thoughts?
During my test, I whacked each knife rapidly against a concrete wall 30 times in a timed 30 secs. While neither knife failed, by the end of the test, the 943's lock bar was slanted heavily toward one side (as if one pulled back on the lock bar with the thumb but not the index finger). The Endura showed no difference.
I don't know what this means, if anything. Any thoughts?