Cliff
Speaking as someone that has used it, but not worked to any extent with it, my experience is that in real use, the edge retention of 440V is pretty close to 25% better than D-2. At best perhaps 50%. If you believe the abrasion resistance charts it should be about 400% better. I'd be interested in hearing if what you find once you start testing it is different.
Maybe part of why this is, hinges in part on what Joe Talmadge and Mike Swaim talk about sometimes, that part of the cutting is the micro-serrations in the edge? D-2 by its composition has fairly large and coarse carbides, so to a certain extent its like dendretic steel, in that its by nature a 'coarse' steel, no matter how much you try to polish the edge. Even once the sharpened edge wears a bit, its exposing some of the carbides which keeps it cutting??? Bob Engnath was fond of referring to D-2 as the steel that took a poor edge, and held it forever....that is it would never polish like a fine grain steel, but the type of edge it does take just keeps working.
CPM steels by virtue of their powdered grain don't have that coarse structure. More abrasion resistant, yes, but I think it also means that once you wear off the sharpened edge, you have a fine, but dull edge. Does that make any sense?
I think one thing the charts can't deal with, and what is going to make it harder getting a valid test is comparing blades with a similar edge and blade geometry, and blade smoothness. I had a 440V blade custom folder that took what felt like an extremely sharp edge, and held it well, but the bead blasted blade dragged so bad in cutting stiff materials that it defeated the purpose of the edge. Ditto for anything with a steep hollow grind on a thicker blade, since in some materials it wedges, and defeats any advantage you may gain from a specialty steel.
madpoet