Cliff Stamp
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 5, 1998
- Messages
- 17,562
In the August 2002 issue of Fine Woodworking there is an informative article on sharpening abrasives (p36-41) by Aime Fraser. Included are Arkansas stones, DMT diamond plates, wet/dry sandpaper, waterstones (natural and synthetic japanese, and Norton), diamond paste (9,6,3 and 0.5 micron), the Tormek, and CrO buffing compound. Two plane blades were sharpened with each abrasive using an angle jig to give consistent results. The sharpness was evaluated using high magnification to examine the edge (700x), and then both planes were used on wood in various ways using the ease of cut and finish to rank the finish.
The upclose pictures of the edge would be of enough interest for me to seek it out, there are also high magnification shots of the abrasives which are interesting. The only downside to the article is that there are several biased conclusons reached. For example the CrO buffing compound is rated as giving a much lower finish than the diamond paste which isn't an accurate representation of its abilities when used optimally. Looking at the magnification shot the CrO polished edge does indeed show a much more uneven finish, but this was because it was prehoned with a 1200 grit DMT hone. The diamond paste on the other hand was stepped down in grits. To see the true ability of CrO you need to prefinish with a very fine hone, such as Lee did in "The Complete Guide to Sharpening".
The article also ranks CrO on leather as giving a worse finish than the Norton waterstone when again the CrO should be used after the waterstone as it is intended as final step to a finely honed edge. The Tormek is also classified as giving rough edges for similar reasons, but it is not clear if the grading stone was used before buffing, or if extended buffing would refine the finish as it has several irregular spots in between highly finished areas.
Ref :
http://www.taunton.com/finewoodworking/pages/wvt049.asp
-Cliff
The upclose pictures of the edge would be of enough interest for me to seek it out, there are also high magnification shots of the abrasives which are interesting. The only downside to the article is that there are several biased conclusons reached. For example the CrO buffing compound is rated as giving a much lower finish than the diamond paste which isn't an accurate representation of its abilities when used optimally. Looking at the magnification shot the CrO polished edge does indeed show a much more uneven finish, but this was because it was prehoned with a 1200 grit DMT hone. The diamond paste on the other hand was stepped down in grits. To see the true ability of CrO you need to prefinish with a very fine hone, such as Lee did in "The Complete Guide to Sharpening".
The article also ranks CrO on leather as giving a worse finish than the Norton waterstone when again the CrO should be used after the waterstone as it is intended as final step to a finely honed edge. The Tormek is also classified as giving rough edges for similar reasons, but it is not clear if the grading stone was used before buffing, or if extended buffing would refine the finish as it has several irregular spots in between highly finished areas.
Ref :
http://www.taunton.com/finewoodworking/pages/wvt049.asp
-Cliff