- Joined
- Jun 20, 2007
- Messages
- 3
I am both somewhat new to Schrade knives and this forum. I have always loved pocket knives, yet I had never bought an Old Timer. I have probably owned at least a hundred pocket knives in my 31 years of age.
My first "Old Timer" had been a Taylor/China Old Timer. I must say my first impression was not a bad one. After further research, I wanted to find out how the USA original compared to the imported Taylor, so I bought one on eBay.
Here are my basic unbiased findings:
*******
USA - Schrade
*******
EBAY - $24
Quality construction
Easy opening/closing, nice smooth snap
Slightly longer (2-3 mm) than the Taylor remake
Scales slightly thinner/duller than import. Natural look.
Carbon Steel - Sharper, prone to rust/stain, requires care and love.
Sharp points on blades.
No gaps along the spine of the knife.
The small blade - same size grove for thumbnail as the large blade
Scale cut pattern is //////////////// (opposite of Taylor)
=======
China - Taylor
=======
ONLINE WEBSITE $13
Quality construction
Difficult opening/closing, ALOT of snap. Tight.
Slightly shorter (2-3 mm) than the original
Scales slightly thicker/shinier than original. Plastic look.
Stainless Steel - Keeps a pretty blade, but not as sharp and harder to sharpen
Rounded points. I am not impressed.
Very minor gaps along the spine of the knife.
The small blade - small grove for thumbnail, annoying to open.
scale cut pattern is \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ (opposite of Schrade USA)
OVERALL SUMMARY:
The Taylor isn't as bad as most make it out to be. It is a solid pocket knife and with care, would serve its owner well.
**I do suspect that in a month or two, the Taylor might have a little wiggle in the blades.**
If you had a choice, the original USA is probably about 15% better in construction quality and character (carbon vs. stainless blade preferences put aside). It feels like your grandfathers knife. You know, the one that has been sharpened SOOO many times you could get poked by the blade point even though the knife was closed.
I must admit I was very happy with the Taylor until I compared it to the Schrade USA original. Yet the Taylor isn't a poor quality knife either.
The USA Schrades are like old Heddon fishing lures. People collect them because they have fond memories of them. Production cost wasn't an issue. They got the job done well without any fancy bells and whistles. Sadly, you rarely see this quality in any American made products anymore. We too believe in cheaper production and higher profit. Please remember that you are no longer supporting a USA company nor its former workers when you buy a USA made Schrade. That profit now goes to "Vintage" dealers. I think we would all buy an authentic Schrade original from China if it was a few dollars cheaper on eBay. It is silly to condemn a foreign company for continuing a proven and respected line of knife design. The foreign counterpart at least opens the door of classic Schrade design to future generations.
My first "Old Timer" had been a Taylor/China Old Timer. I must say my first impression was not a bad one. After further research, I wanted to find out how the USA original compared to the imported Taylor, so I bought one on eBay.
Here are my basic unbiased findings:
*******
USA - Schrade
*******
EBAY - $24
Quality construction
Easy opening/closing, nice smooth snap
Slightly longer (2-3 mm) than the Taylor remake
Scales slightly thinner/duller than import. Natural look.
Carbon Steel - Sharper, prone to rust/stain, requires care and love.
Sharp points on blades.
No gaps along the spine of the knife.
The small blade - same size grove for thumbnail as the large blade
Scale cut pattern is //////////////// (opposite of Taylor)
=======
China - Taylor
=======
ONLINE WEBSITE $13
Quality construction
Difficult opening/closing, ALOT of snap. Tight.
Slightly shorter (2-3 mm) than the original
Scales slightly thicker/shinier than original. Plastic look.
Stainless Steel - Keeps a pretty blade, but not as sharp and harder to sharpen
Rounded points. I am not impressed.
Very minor gaps along the spine of the knife.
The small blade - small grove for thumbnail, annoying to open.
scale cut pattern is \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ (opposite of Schrade USA)
OVERALL SUMMARY:
The Taylor isn't as bad as most make it out to be. It is a solid pocket knife and with care, would serve its owner well.
**I do suspect that in a month or two, the Taylor might have a little wiggle in the blades.**
If you had a choice, the original USA is probably about 15% better in construction quality and character (carbon vs. stainless blade preferences put aside). It feels like your grandfathers knife. You know, the one that has been sharpened SOOO many times you could get poked by the blade point even though the knife was closed.
I must admit I was very happy with the Taylor until I compared it to the Schrade USA original. Yet the Taylor isn't a poor quality knife either.
The USA Schrades are like old Heddon fishing lures. People collect them because they have fond memories of them. Production cost wasn't an issue. They got the job done well without any fancy bells and whistles. Sadly, you rarely see this quality in any American made products anymore. We too believe in cheaper production and higher profit. Please remember that you are no longer supporting a USA company nor its former workers when you buy a USA made Schrade. That profit now goes to "Vintage" dealers. I think we would all buy an authentic Schrade original from China if it was a few dollars cheaper on eBay. It is silly to condemn a foreign company for continuing a proven and respected line of knife design. The foreign counterpart at least opens the door of classic Schrade design to future generations.