Jim March
Knifemaker / Craftsman / Service Provider
- Joined
- Oct 7, 1998
- Messages
- 3,022
OK, as best I can I've drawn two pictures of a generic Khukuri, one in "Western drafting tradition" and the other a crude copy of what I saw Pala do last Saturday.
If I was trying to do the Western approach in more serious fashion, I would have done more "cutaway blade profile mini-pictures", spaced maybe one per inch or so. But those two give a decent impression of the blade shape at those two points. I also did a "rear view" to show the pommel in detail.
The most startling thing about "Pala's version" is that the pommel is "twisted around" to show it to you in the same view. The limited computer drawing tools I have on hand cannot properly do this so the pommel looks "artificially flat" - that's not a limit of the drawing system. The grind faces on the blade are indicated by light sketched lines and the angles they're drawn at indicate "steepness" - compare the lines on the spine bulge to the main blade edge face lines.
The Nepalese system isn't quite as accurate but it's very "information dense" - less drawing needs to happen to show more of what's there. As long as the draftsman and the maker both understand the conventions it'll work just fine.
But NOW you know why the kamis cannot translate the drawings some of us have sent! They use totally different conventions.
Send a wood/plexiglas/whatever mockup, or bring Pala an original to draw in "Nepali fashion". I wouldn't trust my limited understanding and interpretation of the system shown here to draw something for the kamis in "Nepal drafting style"!
Neat, huh?
Jim

If I was trying to do the Western approach in more serious fashion, I would have done more "cutaway blade profile mini-pictures", spaced maybe one per inch or so. But those two give a decent impression of the blade shape at those two points. I also did a "rear view" to show the pommel in detail.
The most startling thing about "Pala's version" is that the pommel is "twisted around" to show it to you in the same view. The limited computer drawing tools I have on hand cannot properly do this so the pommel looks "artificially flat" - that's not a limit of the drawing system. The grind faces on the blade are indicated by light sketched lines and the angles they're drawn at indicate "steepness" - compare the lines on the spine bulge to the main blade edge face lines.
The Nepalese system isn't quite as accurate but it's very "information dense" - less drawing needs to happen to show more of what's there. As long as the draftsman and the maker both understand the conventions it'll work just fine.
But NOW you know why the kamis cannot translate the drawings some of us have sent! They use totally different conventions.
Send a wood/plexiglas/whatever mockup, or bring Pala an original to draw in "Nepali fashion". I wouldn't trust my limited understanding and interpretation of the system shown here to draw something for the kamis in "Nepal drafting style"!
Neat, huh?
Jim