- Joined
- Jan 20, 2008
- Messages
- 609
I am about to buy my first fixed-blade, the RC-4 (I think). I'm still not sure if it's THE MOST versatile knife size, to be buying for my first. Without owning a small and large knife now (fixed blade), I feel that my only knife is tasked as a real "do-all" blade. For hiking and camping, it will most likely be accompanied by a SAK. I suspect that the RC-4 can do almost all of the delicate work that an RC-3 can do. Is that generally reasonable?
I was thinking that the RC-4 would have the advantage that it could handle bigger-blade duties MUCH better than the RC-3. What are your thoughts?
At this point, I cannot simply buy both.
I was thinking that the RC-4 would have the advantage that it could handle bigger-blade duties MUCH better than the RC-3. What are your thoughts?
At this point, I cannot simply buy both.