- Joined
- Jun 14, 2000
- Messages
- 71
I was wondering is any of the Smiths here had seen the article in January's SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN about a possible discovery of how to make "true" damascus (wootz as opposed to pattern-welded). I'm curious about the Pros' opinions on this.
For the record (and anyone who hasn't seen the article) the author, one John D. Verhoeven reports that he and a Floridian Bladesmith, one Alfred H. Pendray believe to have rediscovered the technique for forging "true" damascus steel.
The really short version of the technique is that the patterns of the steel are cultured like bacteria.
A more informative summary: An ingot of steel is formed, intentionally containing several trace impurities--the author particularly indicating vanadium and molybdenum as being conducive to the process--in an enclosed crucible. As the ingot, about the size of a hockey puck, is shaped into a blade, it is naturally heated repeatedly. During the process, the impurities segregate themselves. Where the impurites are found, the crystals of the steel are slower to disintegrate during heating; so a veining of harder steel forms throughout the bar around the impurities, where the crystaline structure never fully breaks down during forging. And so a composite is formed that holds a remarkable edge and, when etched with acid, shows a beautiful pattern of varying grades of steel.
So the harder steel is induced to "grow" throughout the softer; as opposed to pattern-weld, where differing metals are, in effect, "woven" together.
I'm very curious to hear thoughts on this.
For the record (and anyone who hasn't seen the article) the author, one John D. Verhoeven reports that he and a Floridian Bladesmith, one Alfred H. Pendray believe to have rediscovered the technique for forging "true" damascus steel.
The really short version of the technique is that the patterns of the steel are cultured like bacteria.
A more informative summary: An ingot of steel is formed, intentionally containing several trace impurities--the author particularly indicating vanadium and molybdenum as being conducive to the process--in an enclosed crucible. As the ingot, about the size of a hockey puck, is shaped into a blade, it is naturally heated repeatedly. During the process, the impurities segregate themselves. Where the impurites are found, the crystals of the steel are slower to disintegrate during heating; so a veining of harder steel forms throughout the bar around the impurities, where the crystaline structure never fully breaks down during forging. And so a composite is formed that holds a remarkable edge and, when etched with acid, shows a beautiful pattern of varying grades of steel.
So the harder steel is induced to "grow" throughout the softer; as opposed to pattern-weld, where differing metals are, in effect, "woven" together.
I'm very curious to hear thoughts on this.