Which digital camera (Nikon Coolpix 4500?)

Bobby B

No more Mr. Knife-guy
Joined
May 18, 2001
Messages
3,053
I am looking for a digital camera for family pictures (i.e. printing) as well as knives (posting).
I have had Nikons for a while, and am leaning in this direction.
The 4500 replaces the 995; is it worth the difference?
Does anyone here sell them?
You can e-mail me below if you have a great offer on one...:D ;)
Thanks,
Rob
 
I just bought a new Sony DSC-S85 digital camera Saturday. I dont see how a person would need more camera than this one, unless they were a professional photographer(and even then, this would work). This camera has a Carl Zeiss lens with 3X optical zoom and 4.1 megapixels of resolution. It also comes with the best rechargeable lithium battery out there. Some of the new cameras have disposible batteries that will end up costing a fortune. The Sony is very user friendly and takes unbelieveable pictures. Comes with Photoshop software and USB cable and recharger. Careful shopping brought the camera to me for $526 total.
 
I have the same Sony camera (got it in May) and would agree that it is a great bit of kit.

Regards,

Ed
 
I got a Canon S110 (Elph) right around when it first came out (~1-1/12 years ago) and I'm pretty pleased with it. It's a 2.1 megapixel, with a 2x optical zoom. I bought this camera mainly for its small size. It's good for just regular family outing type picture taking, but if you don't care about the size I would say to go with a better zoom. It gives a good pic up to 8x10 on a dye sublimation type printer (I don't like printing on my inkjet). Danbo's right about the rechargeable batteries--stay away from anything that uses only disposables because they die real quick. As for taking pics of knives, I find that I have a problem with closeup shots because I don't have enough light. When I take it outside (in the sun), I get a pretty good pic but am still not satisfied with it for closeups--probably just due to a lack of any photography skills, though.
 
Based on a few responses, as well as other advice I am expanding my options; someone suggested Fuji as well.
Thoughts?
 
I spent a lot of time researching cameras before I made my purchase which was about 7 months ago. At that time I felt like the Nikon 885 was the best value. It is very small and offers 3.21 effective Megapixels. It's sorta easy to overbuy and get a bunch of bells and whistles you'll never use. I set my budget at $500 and got more camera than frankly I needed. It takes great pictures and is relatively easy to use. One important feature to consider is the macro mode. Many cameras I looked at would not let you get physically close to the subject,,important to me for taking really close shots of my knives. This camera can get very close. A tripod is a must for these shots. Definitely lots to consider. Good luck.


Phillip:)
 
Originally posted by Bobby B
Based on a few responses, as well as other advice I am expanding my options; someone suggested Fuji as well.
Thoughts?
When I was shopping around for a camera I ran into some Fuji reps at a camera store and they gave me a tour of their line. While everything seemed to be a good quality, I think they're a little overpriced (the Finepix line). I also don't like the shape of the camera--kinda like it's standing on it's side. It's supposed to have a "super CCD" thing going (I think that's what it was called), which means that the pixels were of a hexagonal shape to fit together better and create a better pic. I don't know whether that was true or not, but in theory it sounds good. Another reason I didn't go with the Fuji was because it uses Smart Media instead of the Compact Flash. If I recall correctly, Smart Media doesn't go as high in memory capacity as Compact Flash does. But on the other hand it's supposed to be more durable--one of the reps said he heard you can dunk it in water, dry it off and it would still work. Compact Flash just seems more versatile to me since you can use it in other things (e.g. PDAs, etc.).
 
Bobby, I have a Fuji Fine pix 6800 and I think it's great. A feature I especially like is it doubles as a web cam and has a macro setting for getting real close up shots. There are 4 modles that have these features. One thing, don't spend alot of $ on a new cam . Like all electronics next year you'll be able to get more for less. Digital cams are still not as good as regular cams but in a couple years they will be (shutter speads aren't that good on low end digitals, so action shots are hit and miss and kids tend to move around alot) . A good place to look for a high pixil cam is on UBid or maybe even E-Bay. Don't be afraid of a used one if you can trust where you get it. I hope this helps a little and good luck with whatever you decide to get.
 
Mongrel, dont feel bad about your purchase. You got a great camera. In order for me to get that price, I had to do a little scamming and be assertive past the normal customer level. What I did was to sort of take advantage of Sear's price matching policy. Sears has a written policy that states that they will match any price from an established internet retailer. What constitutes an "established" internet retailer, is where the problem enters.

What I did was to surf the internet a little and print up a few price quotes from some lowball sites. These lowball(possibly bait and switch ripoff) sites were listing prices of more than $200 less than Sears was selling the camera for. Sears requires that you print up the final page of the price quote that lists all applicable shipping costs too. Even still, the price came to about $180 less than Sear's price.

I showed up with my handy dandy printouts and was immediately told that "Oh no, Sears will not honor that price. It has to be an internet site that also has a brick and mortar store". Excuse me? Where does it say that in your written policy? The salesman tried to ignore me, and hope that I was going away. Not on your life.

I stood my ground and made him call the toll free line that verifies these internet sites. Sure enough, the answer was no. These sites do not meet the qualifications, I was told. Again, the salesman tried to avoid me and hoped that I was going away. Not today. I looked at him and said again, that nowhere in Sear's written policy, does it state the internet site must have a brick and mortar storefront or meet certain qualifications. Only that it must be an established internet retailer. Pretty vague.

The salesman finally said that "there is nothing more I can do, sorry". I said, bring the manager over and let me talk to him. He gets the manager on the phone and the manager said that although they cannot match that price, he will split the difference with me, and knock $80 off the price. That was good enough for me, since the lowball price from the internet was probably a ripoff grey market(foreign market, with no US warrante) camera anyway. That knocked the price down to $558 after taxes. I get home, and my wife gives me another Sears coupon for $30 off. I go back up and get the adjustment,and the final price ended up $526. That took some bickering that a lot of people wouldnt have gone through, but sure was better than the regular price of $600 plus 7.5% sales tax.
 
I love hearing those stories. Perserverance pays off :)

Makes me feel better about the $20 rebate I was ripped off for on a dishwasher the Sears appliance salesman told me "was offered on that model". Yea right, not according to your rebate center it wasn't!

They are great cameras imho, everone I show the pictures too can't believe their digital. I was sold on the Carl Zeiss lens which I promptly covered with the VAD-S70 adapter and a skylight filter to protect it.

Once again-hats off to you for a great buy man.

Mongrel
 
I've got a Nikon Coolpix 880 and it's great! I've taken all sorts of photos with it: landscapes, portraits, macro shots, and the detail is amazing. Highly recommended. :)
 
Danbo,
Great story: a man after my own heart!:D
That's the sort of thing I would do... as a matter of fact, I may have to try just that!!!
Once I make up frigging mind what I need ($) vs what I want ($$$$$):eek: :rolleyes:
 
if size is an issue, i would definitely recommend canon's powershot series. specifically the s200 or s300. they have a video mode (up to 30 seconds) and are easy to use. i also had a nikon that took great pictures but was just too big for me to carry around with me. i wanted something that i could have with me pretty much all the time so i'd never miss a shot. the canons are great for that. i'd definitely consider how much you're planning on carrying it around and also how big prints you're expecting to make with it.

- Pete
 
I played with a Canon S-30, and quite liked it. The only weak spot is the Macro, and it wasn't too bad...
I am looking as well at the Nikon Coolpix 995 which is available re-furbished for $460 + shipping...
 
I'm looking at the Minolta dImage7 model - but Shelby Chan is the resident camera guru. I'd ask him about cameras for a good opinion.

Kevin
 
I recently went thru the whole waht camera thing. I ended up with a Canon G2 and am totally pleased with it. I highly recommend checking it out.
 
Spark,
Thanks I will fire off an e-mail to Shelby. He has posted once before on the topic. ;)

Nosamk,
My sister and brother-in-law have the G2. Nice camera! But... a little more than I really want to spend...:( Now if someone has one to trade...?!?!:D
 
I just got a Fuji finepix 2600zoom 2.0 megapixels, 3x optical zoom, 2.5 digital. JPEG and AVI. + TO 38 TO 114MM on a 35mm camera. It has a macro setting. Smartmedia.

I got it at Staples. It was priced at $279. I found a $30 off of 150 coupon on the net. Bought it. Found it for 199 on the net...printed it out and took that back to staples for a 115% price match. Staples gave me 115% of the difference between the 199 and their original price of 279. Woohoo! They should have p.m.ed against the couponed price (249) and added next day shipping (27) to the 199 cost. I wasn't about to tell the cashier how to do her job.

Cost to me...a 279 camera...$162!!!

Can anybody beat that deal?
 
Back
Top