- Joined
- Mar 3, 2012
- Messages
- 476
I got in late tonight from out of town jazzed about opening up my new Kershaw Zing 1735OR. I already owned the 1735 (regular black model with grooves).
I carry my Zing A LOT. I know what that knife feels like better than my own... Well, maybe not that good. But you get the idea. When I first started to handle the 1735OR that arrived tonight I noticed a few things immediately:
1st - The detent was weaker making it harder to build tension with the flipper (thus harder to open in that method).
2nd - Opening via thumbstud was vastly improved because the detent wasn't crazy strong and it no longer posed a threat to rip the skin off my thumb.
So, a little yen/yang... At first, I chalked this up to knives coming off the assembly line SLIGHTLY different. I get it, it was a mass produced blade. But then, it hit me. The linerlock was easier to disengage. HRMMM... I immediately reached for my trusty 1735 black model and wouldn't you know it, the liners are NOT the same thickness. This floored me. Why would Kershaw make the 1735OR thinner than the regular 1735?
Next... 2008 is stamped on my original Zing, but there is no date on my new 1735OR. I'm currently perplexed. I have no doubt it is a real Kershaw (I'm not at all making any accusation to that end).
Here are my questions. Why? What accounts for this difference? Why did Kershaw change the design? Which model is an earlier production?
Just to clarify, the handle scales are the exact same thickness and shape. Only the liner has changed in thickness. The overall design is thinner.
I carry my Zing A LOT. I know what that knife feels like better than my own... Well, maybe not that good. But you get the idea. When I first started to handle the 1735OR that arrived tonight I noticed a few things immediately:
1st - The detent was weaker making it harder to build tension with the flipper (thus harder to open in that method).
2nd - Opening via thumbstud was vastly improved because the detent wasn't crazy strong and it no longer posed a threat to rip the skin off my thumb.
So, a little yen/yang... At first, I chalked this up to knives coming off the assembly line SLIGHTLY different. I get it, it was a mass produced blade. But then, it hit me. The linerlock was easier to disengage. HRMMM... I immediately reached for my trusty 1735 black model and wouldn't you know it, the liners are NOT the same thickness. This floored me. Why would Kershaw make the 1735OR thinner than the regular 1735?
Next... 2008 is stamped on my original Zing, but there is no date on my new 1735OR. I'm currently perplexed. I have no doubt it is a real Kershaw (I'm not at all making any accusation to that end).
Here are my questions. Why? What accounts for this difference? Why did Kershaw change the design? Which model is an earlier production?
Just to clarify, the handle scales are the exact same thickness and shape. Only the liner has changed in thickness. The overall design is thinner.