- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Messages
- 1,375
I recently had the dubious privilege of handling the new Puma TAC-1 "tactical" knife...
You can find a picture here:
http://www.outdoormania.com/belt.htm
Without judging the aesthetics of this knife, which are a pretty subjective matter, technically this knife can be summed up as the epitome of the hype-only no-quality knife.
The only good thing is the grip, which would deserve a far better blade.
The blade, though manufacturd out of high quality steel, has a weird shape, deprived of any functionality. The spur near the point impedes any real deep penetration in stabbing tests, the edge, though being chisel ground, a grind which supposedly offers a keener thinner edge, is thick as an axe and is more a wedge than an edge. The chisel grind, as always happens, has been ground on the WRONG side for a right handed user. All in all it seems a half finished slab of steel worked to look as a supposedly mean knife.
Moreover the finish of the blade is messy, with ground marks going every way.
The only judgement that can be given on this knife is: a waste of good steel.
Another knife from the same firm, fitted with stag scales, had large gaps between tang and scales, mostly filled with some kind of plaster or epoxy paste, which left holes anyway. The blade was brush polished with brush marks going everywhere, moreover it was ground in such a way that the edge formed a very dull angle. Not good for a skinner, which was supposedly the task for which the knife was built.
I'm very suprised of finding such cr@p (because there is no other word to define these pieces) from a firm which was famous for producing very high quality knives.

You can find a picture here:
http://www.outdoormania.com/belt.htm
Without judging the aesthetics of this knife, which are a pretty subjective matter, technically this knife can be summed up as the epitome of the hype-only no-quality knife.
The only good thing is the grip, which would deserve a far better blade.
The blade, though manufacturd out of high quality steel, has a weird shape, deprived of any functionality. The spur near the point impedes any real deep penetration in stabbing tests, the edge, though being chisel ground, a grind which supposedly offers a keener thinner edge, is thick as an axe and is more a wedge than an edge. The chisel grind, as always happens, has been ground on the WRONG side for a right handed user. All in all it seems a half finished slab of steel worked to look as a supposedly mean knife.
Moreover the finish of the blade is messy, with ground marks going every way.
The only judgement that can be given on this knife is: a waste of good steel.
Another knife from the same firm, fitted with stag scales, had large gaps between tang and scales, mostly filled with some kind of plaster or epoxy paste, which left holes anyway. The blade was brush polished with brush marks going everywhere, moreover it was ground in such a way that the edge formed a very dull angle. Not good for a skinner, which was supposedly the task for which the knife was built.
I'm very suprised of finding such cr@p (because there is no other word to define these pieces) from a firm which was famous for producing very high quality knives.
