- Joined
- Dec 20, 2005
- Messages
- 2,045
I recently started experimenting with thin stock, took a 1/16" thick piece of S30V and put a 1/2" high convex grind on it leaving the rest flat (basically kind of a convex scandi grind) -and it really works very well!
Anyone else do this?
This knife pretty much outcuts anything else I've ever made slicing paper, cardboard, leather, rope. Why aren't more makers using thin stock -or is it the perception that bigger is better. Thicker stock gives the customer a feeling of quality or security? But isn't it overkill?
I mean, a good utility knife can be made from 1/16" thick steel -the only thing this knife probably can't do is chop, be battoned through wood and pry on things. I'm thinking that when most makers use 1/8" thick steel, they could make use of 1/16" instead and it would probably work better.
I'd like to see some folders in the future utilizing S90V in 1/16" thickness, optimally hardened with a convex grind -as most of us use a folder for cutting paper, cardboard, etc. When would 1/8" thick steel really be better?
Any thoughts on this?
Anyone else do this?
This knife pretty much outcuts anything else I've ever made slicing paper, cardboard, leather, rope. Why aren't more makers using thin stock -or is it the perception that bigger is better. Thicker stock gives the customer a feeling of quality or security? But isn't it overkill?
I mean, a good utility knife can be made from 1/16" thick steel -the only thing this knife probably can't do is chop, be battoned through wood and pry on things. I'm thinking that when most makers use 1/8" thick steel, they could make use of 1/16" instead and it would probably work better.
I'd like to see some folders in the future utilizing S90V in 1/16" thickness, optimally hardened with a convex grind -as most of us use a folder for cutting paper, cardboard, etc. When would 1/8" thick steel really be better?
Any thoughts on this?
