#1 of 1000 scratched, can it be fixed?

Joined
May 22, 2014
Messages
26
I bought my Dad a Benchmade years ago. It was #1 of 1000.

For whatever reason, he decided to try to sharpen it or something and scratched the blade.

Can Benchmade repair that? How much do y'all think it'll cost?

Well, forum won't let me upload pictures yet, so can't show the damage. :(
 
Here we go

post-1-14007733328391_thumb.jpg


post-1-14007733797323_thumb.jpg
 
Why don't you just call their customer service and ask them directly?

You'll get a definitive answer to your question in less the a minute.

Their number is : 1-800-800-7427

Good luck and all the best!
 
Depends on what you want to do with the knife. To many, first production is just a trial and error period for the regular production line, so it is not as thought after as limited production.

I don't think BKC will replace the writing. So, the choices are try to buff it out with stropping compound and keep it as is, or request blade swap to D2 with no writing.
 
I bought my Dad a Benchmade years ago. It was #1 of 1000.

For whatever reason, he decided to try to sharpen it or something and scratched the blade.

Can Benchmade repair that? How much do y'all think it'll cost?

Well, forum won't let me upload pictures yet, so can't show the damage. :(

What did Benchmade say when you contacted them?
 
Depends on what you want to do with the knife. To many, first production is just a trial and error period for the regular production line, so it is not as thought after as limited production.

I don't think BKC will replace the writing. So, the choices are try to buff it out with stropping compound and keep it as is, or request blade swap to D2 with no writing.

So basically it being a first production run and #1 of 1,000 adds no value to the knife?

If not, we're just going to start using it.
 
Last edited:
So basically it being a first production run and #1 of 1,000 adds no value to the knife?

If not, we're just going to start using it.

That would be correct. The knives i've seen over the last 10 years with the # of ### don't seem to add anything to the price, in some cases those are worth a bit less because of the NASCAR effect.
 
Your options here are limited unless you are OK with fading the engraving significantly, or practically removing it. As others have noted, the first production may add some value to a few collectors, but many people are indifferent to it. Once a First Production gets used, sharpened, marked up, or the original box is badly damaged or lost, any premium in the collector's value is going to be a lot less. if the knife was sharpened, it's really not in collector condition. Much like cars, knife restorations are not worth nearly as much as originals and one often spends more money on repairing than they would selling as-is. The Benchmade 710 also isn't really a cosmetic knife; it's more of a user and a large bulk of people buying the 710 are purchasing it for a hard work knife with little or no concern for cosmetics or stamping.


Keeping the engraving as it's current state, and removing the marks to a satisfactory level is probably not possible for Benchmade or a DIY job. Any time you have brushed steel, you cannot just polish one small area because the brush lines themselves will look different on the polished vs non-polished areas if you are using an abrasive compound. While the pictures aren't great, you would probably need a more aggressive compound to remove these marks. A light compound can reduce some of the marking (think a Cape Cod cloth), but the effectiveness will be limited.

Prism Polish is pretty good with brushed surfaces and spot treatment. I generally use it on surfaces that I do not want to completely remove the finish. It's expensive, and not very aggressive, but it is the best polish I have used thus far for this purpose. Usage of this polish with a wooden cotton swab after you tape off the engraving with painter's tape may lessen the look. If it were me personally, that would be the option I would use knowing ahead that it will not make the finish perfect, but it will reduce the appearance of the cosmetic markings a reasonable amount.

You aren't going to be able to machine polish just that area only either. Machine polishing will quickly remove the marks, but also quickly diminish the visibility of the brush lines if you are only polishing one area, and abrasives will fade the engraving if rubbed in. If you do an outright refinishing or if you accidentally machine polish over the area of the engraving, the engraving is going to fade quickly and look terrible.

Another option is stonewashing the blade. This will fade the engraving some, but will most likely require a full reprofiling of the edge due to the damage caused by the process of stones making contact with the edge.

Benchmade can replace the blade, but they are not using ATS-34 steel, and unless something has changed, they do not re-engrave this type of marking (but call to be sure).

So honestly, I don't think it's worth the effort or money if the main purpose of repair is for the value, because I think you will spend a lot more money, time, and effort than you will get in return. If the option of using it is one which you started, I think that is the best choice. ATS-34 is a great steel and many people prefer it over some of the newer steels, so it would be a great user.
 
Surprised nobody's mentioned the fact that all 1000 of those first production 710's all say 1 of 1000.
This became quite confusing for many people thinking they were getting the very first one #1 and they have since quit marking them that way.
 
Not to contradict, I think the Camp Perry's were marked this way as well. All being 1/1000.

I watched some Youtube's on that Perry when considering,,,all were very excited thinking they had received the very first in the run... Both funny, and sad to watch.
 
Ha! Not even possible to know if it is #1..... What was Benchmade thinking when they numbered these knives all #1 of XXXX? :grumpy:

Well, based what you guys have told me. There is no value here to restoring and preserving this one.

I'm just going to use this one as a pocket knife until I get myself a Benchmade 9170 Triage. :)
 
Not to contradict, I think the Camp Perry's were marked this way as well. All being 1/1000.

I watched some Youtube's on that Perry when considering,,,all were very excited thinking they had received the very first in the run... Both funny, and sad to watch.

yes, the camp perry blade would be an exception to my remarks.
 
Ha! Not even possible to know if it is #1..... What was Benchmade thinking when they numbered these knives all #1 of XXXX? :grumpy:

Well, based what you guys have told me. There is no value here to restoring and preserving this one.

I'm just going to use this one as a pocket knife until I get myself a Benchmade 9170 Triage. :)

The # is the key. It doesn't say #1 - it just says 1 of 1000. That's a huge difference.
 
Well, based what you guys have told me. There is no value here to restoring and preserving this one.
None. There is benefit to sending it in for a blade swap, however, as D2 is far superior to ATS-34. It isn't quite as stainless, but the benefit of increased toughness and edge retention more than makes up for it.
 
I might just do that.

History on this knife...

It basically hasn't been used over the years. I bought it for my Dad for a Christmas gift back in probably 1998 or so. For some reason, he thought he could get it more sharp and ended up scratching the piss out of the blade. Then he got disgusted after that and just gave it back to me and all I did with it was keep it stored.

I still don't understand it to this day. Scratch it and then give it back to me? But whatever.
 
That is a beautiful blade on that. Basically fresh, all the material there. The ATS-34 BM used was very good. Some say better than the later, US version 154CM. The ATS "Glows" beautifully, different than the 154...almost the difference between Nickle and Chrome...looks just slightly richer. Not to mention, the shapes of the re curves have changed slightly over the years.

Do what you wish, ..I might keep that blade, use it, really is a great steel. (You'll lose the antennas, man..nooo) Perhaps even learn to hand sharpen it, then years from now...swap it out.

BM's D2 is awesome however...LOL

Just to confuse the situation...
 
None. There is benefit to sending it in for a blade swap, however, as D2 is far superior to ATS-34. It isn't quite as stainless, but the benefit of increased toughness and edge retention more than makes up for it.

I don't think the difference in ATS-34 vs. D2 justifies the price of a blade swap at all, which is $25-35 in most cases. ATS-34 is a high-performance steel as-is, with good edge retention, very good toughness, and very good corrosion resistance. Why spend 20-25% the cost of the knife to replace a really good blade with another really good blade in virtually the same functional condition on a user? Plus, the current ATS-34 blade on it now is a helluva lot neater than a virgin blade without those markings, even if it doesn't affect economic value all that much.

I was also under the impression that ATS-34 is compositionally similar to 154CM, in which the toughness of 154CM and D2 are pretty similar and D2's primary benefit over 154CM is increased wear resistance?
 
Back
Top