- Joined
- Feb 1, 2011
- Messages
- 6
Hey gang,
In my experience my 1095s always seem to be my "go to" blades, but D2 has its advantages as well (extreme hardness, etc.).
I've seen opinions that D2 - although extremely hard - will take a lot of work to re-hone and get an edge again, while 1095 gets right back in the game a lot quicker. This has been my own experience as well.
Any thoughts on this? Also, I've seen a lot of blade disciples claim that their 1095s are much "tougher" (less prone to blade chip, etc.) than the D2s they've used. Again, seeking experienced opinions.
As I said, in my own experience the D2s do hold an edge much better, but for overall "toughness", chip-resisitance, ease of sharpening, resilience in cold weather and re-shaping it seems to me that good 'ole 1095 is tough to beat. I'd love to hear any thoughts on this.
Take care
bladebobby
In my experience my 1095s always seem to be my "go to" blades, but D2 has its advantages as well (extreme hardness, etc.).
I've seen opinions that D2 - although extremely hard - will take a lot of work to re-hone and get an edge again, while 1095 gets right back in the game a lot quicker. This has been my own experience as well.
Any thoughts on this? Also, I've seen a lot of blade disciples claim that their 1095s are much "tougher" (less prone to blade chip, etc.) than the D2s they've used. Again, seeking experienced opinions.
As I said, in my own experience the D2s do hold an edge much better, but for overall "toughness", chip-resisitance, ease of sharpening, resilience in cold weather and re-shaping it seems to me that good 'ole 1095 is tough to beat. I'd love to hear any thoughts on this.
Take care
bladebobby