- Joined
- Jan 27, 2016
- Messages
- 13
I've been looking at a popular auction site lately and I'm noticing that a lot of the 2 dot and no dot (late and early 70s respectively) blades have had significant thinning work done to them. Is this necessary? It really uglys them up. I suppose I can understand why an owner would want that (thinner blade=smaller bevel=more efficient cutting), but I don't like it. I want another 110 to tide me over while mine is getting spa treatment, and I really like 440C.
Am I SOL? How many unmolested examples are out there? I know budget sort of drives everything, and I'm watching a few items now, but so many of them are just ugly as hell.
Is it popular to thin the blade? Is it because of the "semi-hollow" nature of the primary grind of that era? Does anyone have experience with this? and if so, how does the knife perform?
Thoughts are appreciated... Thanks
Am I SOL? How many unmolested examples are out there? I know budget sort of drives everything, and I'm watching a few items now, but so many of them are just ugly as hell.
Is it popular to thin the blade? Is it because of the "semi-hollow" nature of the primary grind of that era? Does anyone have experience with this? and if so, how does the knife perform?
Thoughts are appreciated... Thanks