112 vs 110 general use

J

jacktrades_nbk

Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
2,787
ive been thinking today, looking at those 2 knives...why is that i need the extra bit of blade in the 110 when i can do pretty much everything with the 112, and it is much more easier to carry around ...
while slicing a piece of bread in just one cut wiyh the 110, i do that in 2 cuts with the 112, so its just those few seconds i gain here ?
just an idea, why do you prefer the 110 over 112, and viceversa, its just the feeling of a bigger blade or it is the actual use of that extra lenght ?
 
While I like both, I find I almost always carry a 110 or a 112.

The larger knife just seems to work better for me.
 
I've carried both (in-pocket and in a sheath) for a fairly long time. I like both, but have to come to prefer the 110. The extra length does come in handy, is rarely too much, and the additional weight is not enough of an issue for me to matter. There are also a lot more variations to choose from if you want something different. That may change some day if Buck ever adds the 112 to the Custom Shop, but I'll believe that when I see it.
 
I used the 112 on a daily basis for eight years back in the 70's. The early 112 blade was just as thick and wide as the 110, but was simply shorter. That was important to me. I had the same amount of heft in a shorter blade. Since it was being used more or less as a utility knife it worked out great. Today's 112 has a blade with a slimmer profile. I think this makes a different when it gets assessed next to a 110. I'd love to see a new 112 with the older blade profile.
 
Since I carry either of them in a sheath I prefer the 110. The extra weight is no issue for me and it just fits my hand better.

I think both are fine knives, but the 110 just fits me better.

Now, for pocket carry I think the 112 would make more sense.

Mike-good info about the older 112 blades being thicker, didn't know that.
 
Mike Kerins said:
I used the 112 on a daily basis for eight years back in the 70's. The early 112 blade was just as thick and wide as the 110, but was simply shorter. That was important to me. I had the same amount of heft in a shorter blade. Since it was being used more or less as a utility knife it worked out great. Today's 112 has a blade with a slimmer profile. I think this makes a different when it gets assessed next to a 110. I'd love to see a new 112 with the older blade profile.
Click to expand...

ive seen that since i have a 2008 112 and a 1979-80 2 dot one (thanks Bear and blue sky for the info in that post )
my 110 is from 2007, so its a new version
i have to say i do prefer the older 112 over the new one
nevertheless, i like them all three, their becoming my favorites with their strong classical look and feel, and i m looking forward to get some other 110 with some variations in handle and steel.
:thumbup:
 
Last edited:
I don't have a photo of the newer 112s but takie a look at the blade on this first version 112 and I think the difference between it and new ones can easily be seen.
 
Mike Kerins said:
I don't have a photo of the newer 112s but takie a look at the blade on this first version 112 and I think the difference between it and new ones can easily be seen.
Click to expand...

Looks like micarta scales as well... very nice looking 112.

I find lately I've been carrying the 112FG, however the 110FG is still my favorate.

Woddy
 
GOSHEN said:
Love both, but the 110 just fits my hand better.
Click to expand...
i agree with the fit issue Goshen..
i bought a 112 in the navy as they were touchy on blade length in places..
i loved the hook ! the shorter blade was jest fine...:thumbup:
the frame jest was too short to feel good..:o
went back and got a 110 ..:)
wish the 110 had a 112 hook:(
 
I never owned a Buck 110 or 112 until a few months ago. I carried knives similar in size to the 110 from other manufacturers. In past few months I've aquired 2 Buck 110's ( Cherokee Tears) but they are too pretty to carry. I also got this 112 CL with nickel-silver bolsters and liners. I told myself I would use this knife but I haven't yet.
I can see the difference in the newer blades- mine is from 2004 according to the former owner.
30v0tcp.jpg
 
It really takes an effort of will to press those beauties into service, doesn't it? I always wage that battle with every new knife.
 
i like using those bucks :D the more i use'em, the more i like'em

the patina they develop gives them something that you simply wont find in a tactical plastic handled knife, but today laws make you carry that kind of knife more, because its more concealable overall, clipped IWB, easier to hide on person
if knives carry would be legal, i would enjoy having that sheath hanging all the time from my belt, but ...
 
I really like the 112....But whats on my belt the last 3 weeks is a 532. A slimmer profile...The 112 is my most carryed tho. I DUC'ed my 06 BCCI club 111 for a few weeks but went back to one of my 112's...The 110/111 is a great EDC but like you I really dont NEED the extra length or weight as small as that might be..I am sorta looking for a 112 that has been 'thinned' or 'trimed' on a belt sander like so many 110's were back in the day..
 
bucksway said:
I really like the 112....But whats on my belt the last 3 weeks is a 532. A slimmer profile...The 112 is my most carryed tho. I DUC'ed my 06 BCCI club 111 for a few weeks but went back to one of my 112's...The 110/111 is a great EDC but like you I really dont NEED the extra length or weight as small as that might be..I am sorta looking for a 112 that has been 'thinned' or 'trimed' on a belt sander like so many 110's were back in the day..
Click to expand...

maybe STR can do something about that :D
 
Mike K., If I may ask you alittle more about your 1972 micarta 112. Is the spacer brass or stainless? I was able to aquire one at the 20yr. reunion to fill out a slot in my collection and boy I like it.As you carried it during those yrs.of your law enforcement career did you feel you needed a knife w/ more blade? I was also able to obtain a .112. in excellant shape and I like it very much too. What a great package! You guys are correct about the greater varations offered w/ the 110. DM
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top