12:34:56 7/8/9

[b.c.molin]

According Wordsmith.org's to Anu Garg who writes A.Word.A.Day: the newsletter:

"An event that will take place later this week, something that happens once and only once over the course of history. Shortly after noon on July 8, comes the moment that can be called 12:34:56 7/8/9.

It's not exactly true that this sequence of time/date happens only once. If you follow the day/month/year convention, you can observe the same sequence next month, on August 7.

And even though it appears to be a rare occurrence, such interesting patterns aren't that unusual. Consider these from the past:
01:23:45 6/7/89
12:34.56 7/8/90
01:02:03 04/05/06

In a couple of years we'll have 11:11:11 11/11/11."

Hope it all adds up to a good day for you Numerologists! :thumbup:

 

[MacHete]

IT ALL ADDS UP TO 23!

 

[Esav Benyamin]

That's rather odd, isn't it?

 

[orca8589]

But . . . but . . . 42 is the only possible answer! What happened? Now I'm confused . . .

thx - cpr

 

[MacHete]

That's rather odd, isn't it?

You don't even know!

But . . . but . . . 42 is the only possible answer! What happened? Now I'm confused . . .

thx - cpr

42: 4 + 2 = 6 = 2 x 3

 

[pagey1973]

According Wordsmith.org's to Anu Garg who writes A.Word.A.Day: the newsletter:

"An event that will take place later this week, something that happens once and only once over the course of history. Shortly after noon on July 8, comes the moment that can be called 12:34:56 7/8/9.



In a couple of years we'll have 11:11:11 11/11/11."

Thats the one I'm hanging for!

 

[MacHete]

01:23:45 6/7/89
12:34.56 7/8/90
01:02:03 04/05/06

11:11:11 11/11/11.

Hope it all adds up to a good day for you Numerologists! :thumbup:

-OR-

0+1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+0+01+02+03+04+05+06+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1=
123!

-AND-

123: 1+2+3 = 6 = 2 x 3

It's really quite creepy.

 

[WalterDavis]

In a couple of years we'll have 11:11:11 11/11/11."

Don't suppose that means anything in binary, does it

 

[Esav Benyamin]

Yes, it means 3:3:3 3/3/3.

 

[WalterDavis]

But if you remove the :s and the /s, according to the first binary translator I found on google, we just get '? ?' ! Holy Schnikeys!! That's an omen if I ever saw one

 

[T.K.C.]

That's rather odd, isn't it?

Yeah, I think it is.

 

[Mongo]

That's it... I'm headed to the store to buy milk, bread, water and some candles. Maybe I'll get some plywood and board up the windows too.

 

[65535]

You do that Mongo.