1st run 165uh

Joined
Apr 22, 2006
Messages
3
I am new to this forum thing but have been checking it out and learned a great deal so far. Just wondering if anyone knew any rough production numbers of first run shcrade 165uh knives. I recently bought one off ebay,
serial number 06969. From reading the archives I know it's a first run (has the eight grooves on blade) and the serial number is on the right side with the
schrade walden 165uh stamp. If anyone has rough values, this one is in very good shape, that would be interesting to know too. I know I paid enough for it but I wanted it and that's the way it goes. Any info would be greatly appreciated, thanks.
 
#13134 is the highest number I have recorded for the first production 165UH, but I doubt that was the last one made in 1970. But even at that, there likely were less than 20,000 made altogether. Alas, we don't have the actual production records, so surveying the numbers we see and adding them to an archive is the best we can do.

The rough value for one in mint condition with the box, papers, stone in the plastic bag, with mint sheath... $100 - 150 or more depending on condition of it all. Less if any components are missing, less for scratches on the blade (poor sharpening or use). Actual value of your particular knife is what you yourself established when you bought it. $50 - 100 for a mint knife and mint sheath is a good buy. To buy an excellent 165OT knife with excellent sheath in a mint early hinged box with mint printed stone for $36 plus shipping is likewise a good deal and the type deal we all aspire to make. See #6622437018


Codger
 
Thanks for the info, most of the details of the knife I purchased were from one of your past "165 bantering" forums. I agree, the value is what you make of it. The knife you have pictured appears to be one recently sold on ebay, is this the best place to locate 165's on the net or are there other valuable auctions out there. I really like this style knife, the weight, balance and overall feel are great. I would not mind adding more to my collection, no matter what my other half thinks. Thanks for the info.
(codger 64, little 64?)
 
(codger 64, little 64?)[/I Yes. ]I have more than a dozen 165's and all but three of them came from eBay. It is a 24/7 knife show, and there are almost always more than 1,500 answers when you call "Here Schrade, Here boy!!". Yes, I recently purchased this one on eBay, mostly for the hinged box and stone. I have a dead mint Walden knife and sheath with early number that will look great in this box. And it was one of the few 165 boxes I didn't have. If the knife itself is a scratched as it appears in the pictures, I'll make it a backup user.

All of the 165s I have are different in one way or another, but my prize one is also used. I bought it way back last century and have used it now for over 30 years, and it still has a full blade and a good handle. The shield fell out in the early '90s and Schrade replaced it free and sent it back in a new sheath. Needless to say, this knife and I have quite a history together. If you read my rant on it, you understand. If not, put your knife in your hand and carry it a day in the woods. You'll see how it can become a comfortable familiar friend!

Codger
 
wetstone,
You might also like the 160OT. It was made until 1993 and is similar in size. I believe they were flat ground as opposed to the hollow grind on the 165OT. They are not as scarce as the 165 so tend to be a bit less expensive on ebay.

I have a few and really like them.

Dale
 
I also have a couple of the 160OT Mountain Lion's and like them. The blades are thinner than the sabre grind Woodsman blade. As LT showed me a while back, the pattern of the 160OT blade is the same as the sabre ground153UH Golden Spike, but with the exposed tang handle of the 165OT. And as a matter of fact, they are a lot less common than the 165OTs. Whereas the 165 was made from 1967-1991, the 160OT was only made from 1990-1995. They do indeed show up on eBay, but not in the quantity that the 165s do.



Codger
 
I have seen several of the 160's but will need to check them a little closer. Also wondering quality on any of the new taylor/schrade knives, have seen the prices and wonder. A good deal is a good deal, but you get what you pay for and these new schrades make me a little nervous. Although I am not aged enough to think of things in terms of centuries, it seams that the older knives are where the real quality is at.
 
I have reviewed here several of the knives that Taylor is importing. The quality just isn't there. The sheaths are composition leather, pressed and glued from leather trimmings like chipboard. The fit and finish on some of the knives is worse than some knives I have seen made in Pakistan. I recommend that you save your money for a real Schrade.

Codger
 
Codger_64 said:
And as a matter of fact, they are a lot less common than the 165OTs. Whereas the 165 was made from 1967-1991, the 160OT was only made from 1990-1995. They do indeed show up on eBay, but not in the quantity that the 165s do.
Codger

Sorry for my earlier misinformation. I thought the 160 was the more common, maybe it is just because they were made more recently, and I had better luck getting the 160s than the 165s. :o

Dale
 
It does seem that of the ones available, more are mint. I think that the knives had a design flaw that contributed to their being withdrawn from production, though I don't know that for a fact. While interviewing an eBay seller of (by coincidence) a 165UH, I garnered some interesting insite, not only as to the Schrade way of doing business (standing behind their product), but also the aforementioned flaw.

"Here is a real collectors item. Up for bid is a Schrade Uncle Henry #165 UH. This is an extremelly well made knife with super balance. I cannot prove this, but this knife was given to me by the president of Schrade over a quality dispute with a lesser value knife. I got my pick of the Schrade line, and I chose this one because it was the best they made. It is used but in fantastic condition. Also comes sheath and sharpening stone. This really is a super quality knife."
Hype or truth? Let's ask, shall we?

"A very interesting story to go with this knife! And very believable, knowing Wally Gardiner also! Can you remember what year this was? This knife was produced between 1994 and 1997. Price was at that time $69.95. Of course, they kept production overruns in the plant for a long time."

So did he stick by his story?

"The story started in 1993 if I remember right. I bought a Schrade hunting knife they had just come out with, lightweight and thin. It broke on the first deer of the season. They replaced it with the same style knife which broke on the first deer it was used on. This started a 2 year battle between me and the company over poor quality knives. I didn't want another of the same, or my money back. I wanted a quality knife from a company I should expect it from. Finally after 2 years I was able to get ahold of Mr. Gardiner himself and present all of my communications, and responses from his company. He sided with me totally and told me to take my pick of any knife they made, and I chose this one. It was the best and just come out. He also gave me a second knife of his choice. Schrade, in my books, is still one of the best."

So far so good.

"Interesting. For my own info, do you remember which model gave you fits?"

Am I bugging the old gent? (I am speculating the knife was a 160OT Mountain Lion, flat ground and relatively thin, 1990-95)

"I really don't rember what model it was. They had just come out with it. It
was the "latest thing". I my self have cleaned literally hundreds of deer in
my lifetime too, it wasn't me that was breaking the knives. The blades would
break splitting the rib cage, hadn't even got to the pelvis. They were the
poorest quality for a hunting knife I had ever seen. They also quit making
them soon after from what I understand. Out of all the work knives I have
ever owned, this one is the best. It has cleaned it's fair share of deer and
hogs and still looks pretty new. It also keeps an edge like you wouldn't
believe. I hate to get rid of it but I can no longer get out and use it
anymore. So I thought I would pass it on. Please feel free to contact me more.
Thanks"

Maybe not. Let's keep at him. I love to pry!

"On the Uncle Henry's experience: Are you / were you by chance a boar hunter? I have some friends here in Tennessee who are hog guides. One of their sons made a fantastic kill on a huge boar with a knife. Our game police informed him it was illegal. Nothing prohibits it, but it is not specifically allowed in the regs."

Maybe he has some hunting stories.

"Yea, I'm a hog hunter/trapper from way back. That's where I get my name
piggman. Here in Texas you can kill them any way you see fit. Yall have
boars , the real thing. Most of what we have are ferral hogs. The biggest I
have under my belt went alittle over 800 lbs. That was one hell of a hog! We
have tried to get one by knife only, but haven't had any luck. We have
speared them though. Makes for an exciting night. Hell, the game wardens
here will help if they are having a boring night."

"I think if you were to regulate the way they were hunted down here, you'ld
probably get hung. It is one of the only large animals you can still make a
really sporting kill of without the "GREENIES" coming down on you. However,
if some "GREENIE" group ever tried to make a public heartbreaking deal of
it, they would probably make the protected list. Poor little piggies. These
things are very destructive to crops and other wildlife like turkey and
deer. Plus, they can get mean. So far the do gooders haven't sunk their
claws that far, but it won't be long."


So that is the story that comes attached to a Texas hunter's 165UH that resides now in Codger's cabin in Tennessee. Yeah, I like knives with a history. Worn handles from a man's sweaty palms. Patina on even a stain-less blade from butchering deer and wild hogs for a decade. The knife outlasting the man. Not a pretty knife, but one that has a tale to tell. Eight hundred pounds? Dang! That was Uncle Festus' mule!

Well, I won the knife, and when it arrived in the mail, while the sheath shows it's miles, the knife was actually near mint! It took a while with jeweler's rouge, but the blade still shows it's original crocus finish, and the handle is not nearly as faded and rough as the picture suggested. I cleaned and polished the brass guard, and the nickle silver rivets and Uncle Henry shield. It looks good enough to display with my older one that is indeed mint. The older one was made in 1969-70.

Incidentally, there is another 165UH out there which could be a third production run, albeit not cataloged. This one is sans shield (not molded or jigged into the handle), and the only ones I have seen with papers indicate post '98 production. Perhaps one of the former employees can enlighten us? Was it an unclaimed SFO? A unused DU adaptation of unused blade overruns? Warranty replacement stock? Notice the hollow ground blade.


Codger
 
Back
Top