I was promted to take these pictures by the recent scalpell thread. The pictures are not too good. The problem is that the camera has a limited contrast range and a limited depth of field. You get to see a lot more through the eyepieces than on the image. Anyway I though they might be interesting to some. They were taken on a Meiji Polarizing microscope with a trinocular head on a pixel link live feed firewire camera through a 10x objective lens and a 0.7x reducer, which amounts to roughly 200x Mag.
The first two pics are of a scalpell (Swann-Morton). One of each side. You can clearly see that while one side is finished with a polished microbevel the other one is not.
http://img197.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img197&image=scalpell8gl.png
http://img197.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img197&image=scalpell25si.png
The next two pics are of a razor blade (again both sides) (scalpell and razor blade both brand new). You can see that the razor blade is NOT polished (so I have to eat my words: I was wrong in the scalpell tread: There is a difference between a razor and a scalpell). But while the razor blade edge is resonably clean, the edge of the scalpell is rather ragged.
http://img197.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img197&image=razor7li.png
http://img197.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img197&image=razor23el.png
The next two pics are of a BRKT Mini-Canadian which comes factory wise with a convexed edge. The edge was polished on a nonparaille blue stone (2500 grit) and then on a Naniwa 10000 grit stone. It doesn't come out as nicely on the pics as thru the eye pieces, but the edge is MUCH more refined and the scratch pattern is much, much finer. This is probably my sharpest knife.
http://img197.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img197&image=minican6xj.png
http://img197.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img197&image=minican22ha.png
The next pic are of a Manix taken from factory to a Bester 700, King 1000, Blue 2500 and Naniwa 10000 stone. The edge looks even better than on the mini Canadian, but the edge profile is a little more obtuse so it is not quite as sharp as the Mini
http://img197.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img197&image=manixpol3xi.png
This pic is of a scratch pattern left by the Spyderco UF stones I made ten very light passes on the UF stones on top of the 10000 grit finish to see how they compare (they are not on the edge because I put a 17 deg edge bevel on the Manix and used the 15 deg setting on the sharpmaker), and you can see how the scratches of even the UF stones stand out against the 10000 grit finish.
http://img197.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img197&image=manixpol27ev.png
The last pic is of the factory edge of the Manix. You can see how the edge is very clean (in comparison to the razor and the scalpell) on a microscopic scale, but how wavy the edge is on a larger scale. I don't know if that is by accident or intentional. I was very surprised to see this under the microscope. These "dents" are invisible to the naked eye. Even knowing that they were there, I could NOT detect them even with a 10x lupe. So even though they appear really large here they are actually VERY small.
http://img197.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img197&image=manixnew9po.png
The first two pics are of a scalpell (Swann-Morton). One of each side. You can clearly see that while one side is finished with a polished microbevel the other one is not.
http://img197.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img197&image=scalpell8gl.png
http://img197.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img197&image=scalpell25si.png
The next two pics are of a razor blade (again both sides) (scalpell and razor blade both brand new). You can see that the razor blade is NOT polished (so I have to eat my words: I was wrong in the scalpell tread: There is a difference between a razor and a scalpell). But while the razor blade edge is resonably clean, the edge of the scalpell is rather ragged.
http://img197.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img197&image=razor7li.png
http://img197.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img197&image=razor23el.png
The next two pics are of a BRKT Mini-Canadian which comes factory wise with a convexed edge. The edge was polished on a nonparaille blue stone (2500 grit) and then on a Naniwa 10000 grit stone. It doesn't come out as nicely on the pics as thru the eye pieces, but the edge is MUCH more refined and the scratch pattern is much, much finer. This is probably my sharpest knife.
http://img197.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img197&image=minican6xj.png
http://img197.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img197&image=minican22ha.png
The next pic are of a Manix taken from factory to a Bester 700, King 1000, Blue 2500 and Naniwa 10000 stone. The edge looks even better than on the mini Canadian, but the edge profile is a little more obtuse so it is not quite as sharp as the Mini
http://img197.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img197&image=manixpol3xi.png
This pic is of a scratch pattern left by the Spyderco UF stones I made ten very light passes on the UF stones on top of the 10000 grit finish to see how they compare (they are not on the edge because I put a 17 deg edge bevel on the Manix and used the 15 deg setting on the sharpmaker), and you can see how the scratches of even the UF stones stand out against the 10000 grit finish.
http://img197.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img197&image=manixpol27ev.png
The last pic is of the factory edge of the Manix. You can see how the edge is very clean (in comparison to the razor and the scalpell) on a microscopic scale, but how wavy the edge is on a larger scale. I don't know if that is by accident or intentional. I was very surprised to see this under the microscope. These "dents" are invisible to the naked eye. Even knowing that they were there, I could NOT detect them even with a 10x lupe. So even though they appear really large here they are actually VERY small.
http://img197.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img197&image=manixnew9po.png