I tried a few 984 once, but they weren't much different than the yellow 967 for how I worked. I guess I'll have to try them again, and maybe the 784 also.
I've been a 984F fan since day one, it's still my favorite belt, however, for hardened stainless or high alloy, at high SFPM and heavy (hand, not heavy by abrasive standards, but it does matter whether you get down on it hard or not) pressure, on a 3HP grinder, I felt the yellow 967s were better. However, recently, they had gotten significantly more expensive (30-ish percent), than the 984F's, so I really couldn't justify it. Hell I can't even justify 984F's when they're 30% more expensive than Blaze belts, even though, they're better, they're not 30% brand-new better.
The 947A's didn't work for me, although I wanted to like them, looking at 3m's current description (they've got some seriously fucked up coding and branding obfuscation, I'm glad they're trying to clear it up, but they need to stop introducing new belts with a slightly different number and the same fucking name), this makes sense.
I'd like to try the 784s, 966, 997 and 994s to see what works best for me. Nickel alloys and titanium is where I always saw the absolute best value in the 984F's, if they've got better versions, I'll be impressed. Hopefully we'll see the 997s and 994s in something like a 40 or 50 grit though, I dislike 36's even for the roughest grinding, because usually the binder doesn't hold up and the abrasive is too loosely distributed, but I'll reserve judgement.
Anybody have any feedback on these newer ones?