485 Valet Review

Joined
Feb 28, 2015
Messages
49
Greetings to all from Snowhio!

Let me start by stating that I am a new member! I have been collecting knives for about 11 years now but never got around to joining a community. I used to write a few firearm reviews on XDTalk and I have been lurking about BF for a long time. Pocket knives are my true passion (and much more affordable than guns..) and I figured it was time to get involved! I look forward to participating with more reviews in the future. Oh, one last thing...I try to be as honest and open minded as possible in my reviews. I am not out to bash anything or anyone and only report what I see with my eyes. As a disabled Army veteran I do not have money to throw around flippantly and therefore I firmly believe in quality for money spent.

The 485 Valet:

Initially, I was very intrigued by this knife. I like smaller gentleman knives. Not exclusively, but they have their rightful place in the EDC rotation and collection. It's a beautiful knife with its grey G10 handle, G10 back spacer...I had to have one. So I ordered one from my favorite knife source: BladeHQ. I was also very interested to try M390 for the first time. I have experience using most standard steels such as 154CM, S30V, D2, ZDP-189 and the crucible variants of 154CM and S30V.

Despite initial reviews and claims of it being tiny, I did not find it so for my medium, spindly sausages. Certainly it was small, but not tiny. The G10 felt nice and not too slick or too grippy, but just right. The proportions were just right for the size, IMHO. The action was a little on the stiff side, but smooth as butter. No trouble using the thumb stud to deploy the blade. Despite the lack of spine jimping, I found it very comfortable in the role as a gentleman's edc blade.

Unfortunately that is where the lust stopped. After unboxing and checking it out, I started to inspect the grind and sharpness. Sad is the only word that comes to mind. I have long loved Benchmades such as my 710 or 741 (Mchenry Williams/Large Onslaught) or 530 Pardue and I was super impressed with my first production Volli. So I am by no means trying to write a butthurt review about Benchmade. But the quality of the blade in my humble opinion was...well...poo.

Why? Well, for starters the grind was slightly canted off to one side. Enough so that the tip was deformed and had a fatter relief cut on one side. It was then no surprise that when I tried to cut some misc. printer paper and magazines that I was disappointed in how dull it was. I am by no means a super sharpening wizz bang go-getter, but I consider myself adequately capable with Arkansas stones and DMT sharpeners. I prefer to sharpen free-hand and I have sharpened enough knives in my time to know that I would not be able to fix it. I really mean that it was DULL.

In my humble opinion there is no excuse for such a poor grind and out of box sharpness for $170. I realize that there are lemons, believe me. My dad worked in a factory for many years machining parts for Honda 4-wheelers. For a short time after the Army I worked at Honda as a parts inspector. There are acceptable tolerances that vary from company to company and industry to industry. I wrote scores of papers about tolerances and quality control for my college business classes. Lemons happen.

But my immense disappointment stemmed from the fact that the last three benchmades I have purchased also had bad grind and sharpness issues. A Bushcraft fixed blade, an Adamas and a Ball flipper. All had very poor grinds and came pretty dull. I was hoping that with the higher end steel I might get lucky...but alas...

Remember, I am not trying to bash Benchmade. I love em. But I returned the Valet to BladeHQ for a refund. Their customer service was 10/10 excellent. I explained the issues and had a return number within 20 minutes. It took about 3 days, but they refunded my money so I could nab another one on the list.

I really liked the knife, don't get me wrong. Everything else about it was super well made. But I firmly believe in out of box performance for my money. I should not have to grind and sharpen beyond some light strops on a super fine stone. I can even accept having to step down to a fine stone. Not every production blade is going to be lightsaber sharp and I get that. But I do expect some degree of sharp, especially from one of the best names in the industry.

Maybe my expectations for Benchmade are too high? I watched a first impression video on YouTube about the Valet and that user also commented that the blade was not very sharp. He did not make a super-big deal about it, but opinions differ. YMMV.

I am very interested to hear from anyone who also bought a Valet and whether or not theirs was sharp or dull.
 
If you are going to post reviews of knives with QC issues you need to post photos.
Welcome to BFs.
 
Why does he need to post photos? This is just a simple review that he wanted to share with us.. like he stated, he isn't trying to bash on the knife..

Thanks for your review, sorry about the knife.. I've had a lot of luck with benchmade.. they are basically all I own/carry.. I've been wanting to get the 485.. I just got the 14716-1, a great knife especially for the money..
 
Why does he need to post photos? This is just a simple review that he wanted to share with us.. like he stated, he isn't trying to bash on the knife..

Thanks for your review, sorry about the knife.. I've had a lot of luck with benchmade.. they are basically all I own/carry.. I've been wanting to get the 485.. I just got the 14716-1, a great knife especially for the money..

I have had a lot of luck with them too in the past. I still regret not getting a Dejavoo while they were in production. Or a Ruckus.

I would still recommend the knife with a caveat that you could experience issues with sharpness. For some of you that would be no problem.

I think if it was sharp out of the box it would be a perfect edc partner to a larger folder if you roll that way. It's very light.

Part of the reason I LOVE my 530 pardue is that I often carry a larger emergency folder and its so light it disappears. It's a great little chore knife and I am sure the Valet with its better steel would be even better not having to be resharpened so often.
 
If you are going to post reviews of knives with QC issues you need to post photos.
Welcome to BFs.

Or what? You are going to revoke my internet? I already sent the knife back to get my many bills of money returned to me. Sorry that does not satisfy you. I can not photograph that which is not in my possession anymore.

Btw, I was not born yesterday and this is certainly not my first time on any kind of forum. Did you even read what I wrote?

Have a wonderful day and thanks for commenting :)!
 
Why does he need to post photos? This is just a simple review that he wanted to share with us.. like he stated, he isn't trying to bash on the knife..

Thanks for your review, sorry about the knife.. I've had a lot of luck with benchmade.. they are basically all I own/carry.. I've been wanting to get the 485.. I just got the 14716-1, a great knife especially for the money..

Not saying the OP is lying, we see a lot of posts regarding QC but not often with photos.
If you are gong to review a knife and state it has QC issues then you owe the forum in which you posted some photos to show the issues. We don't get much info by a review with no images to show us what the OP considers a problem.
 
th


OK billy, I got it! Here is a photo of the knife. The shiny part was messed up.
 
Not saying the OP is lying, we see a lot of posts regarding QC but not often with photos.
If you are gong to review a knife and state it has QC issues then you owe the forum in which you posted some photos to show the issues. We don't get much info by a review with no images to show us what the OP considers a problem.

Or you could read about the problem of which I explained in plain English.
 
485%20Valet%202_zpshrmei9i5.jpg
[/URL][/IMG]

Hope this image helps, Billy. Sorry for the crude photo, but I am not very smart at operating these things.
 
Hi G.I. Jon,

I have a 485, centering of the blade on mine was good. The sharpness was also very sharp, it cut through magazine paper like a laser beam. I also didn't see any lopsidedness.

Looking at the edge with a 10x eye loupe I could see the grind grooves or machining marks, this bothered me so it took me close to 2 hours on my Sharpmaker (medium & fine stones) to get a acceptable edge to my satisfaction.

I know that the fit and finish can't compare to a CRK but I do think you get a lot of knife for the money. I actually enjoyed touching up the knife edge and pocket clip, kinda lets me tinker, sort of like tuning up a muscle car.

I hope you do end up with a knife you are satisfied with, check out the Spyderco Techno it is fantastic in fit, finish and function.

Thks for your service to our country!!
 
Nice review. BM service is outstanding for any issues.
Thanks for serving our Country.
 
Btw, I was not born yesterday and this is certainly not my first time on any kind of forum. Did you even read what I wrote?

Then you would know, if you receive a knife with "issues" the courteous thing to do would be to first give the seller / manufacture a chance to make it right (By fixing or replacing) before starting a thread about the issue. Starting a thread in a manufactures sub forum is a last resort not the first.

In the case of a review, then the customer service of the seller / manufacture can also be part if it. Including resolution and conclusion. How and if they resolved it to ones satisfaction.

Why return a knife for refund you like so much due to a QC issue that's so easily fixable by replacement? That comes across more like buyers remorse.

And a note on courtesy and forum etiquette, If you are going to drop into a manufactures sub forum and claim QC issues, It's perfectly reasonable to expect to show pictures of what you are talking about.

Not saying everything you said isn't true, but the way it comes across is another very new member with no history here making claims disparaging a manufacture and their product with nothing to substantiate it.

I hope you can see that side of it too.
 
Last edited:
Hey Jon, keep up the good work. Too often levity is absent around these type threads. :thumbup:
 
Then you would know, if you receive a knife with "issues" the courteous thing to do would be to first give the seller / manufacture a chance to make it right (By fixing or replacing) before starting a thread about the issue. Starting a thread in a manufactures sub forum is a last resort not the first.

In the case of a review, then the customer service of the seller / manufacture can also be part if it. Including resolution and conclusion. How and if they resolved it to ones satisfaction.

Why return a knife for refund you like so much due to a QC issue that's so easily fixable by replacement? That comes across more like buyers remorse.

And a note on courtesy and forum etiquette, If you are going to drop into a manufactures sub forum and claim QC issues, It's perfectly reasonable to expect to show pictures of what you are talking about.

Not saying everything you said isn't true, but the way it comes across is another very new member with no history here making claims disparaging a manufacture and their product with nothing to substantiate it.

I hope you can see that side of it too.

Agreed.
 
I know it is expected that a member post a picture when complaining about a knife, and normally I don't disagree with that practice, but IMHO, there have been enough threads recently pertaining to QC issues, that it really doesn't seem mandatory in this case.

I have been a BM fan and user for about 18 years, and have owned quite a few different versions. I still have some, and carry one every day, and will buy more in the future because I like them... I have been very fortunate with all of my BM's, and have never had issues with any of them. Who knows, perhaps that will change with my next purchases. I hope not.

That said, it is no big surprise that a member would post about a QC issue. We have all seen a trend lately, and the issues don't seem to be getting addressed.
There has been no comments from BM regarding the QC issues, so maybe they are working on it, maybe they aren't. None of us here know.

Yes he did return it, when the problem could have probably been easily remedied, but a person shouldn't have to fix issues with a new knife.
Not everyone wants to fix or return a new knife they just got. Rightfully so... We all have different ways of dealing with things, and deciding what we consider acceptable as far as QC issues.

Personally I don't see anything wrong with his post. Actually the picture was very funny :D
 
I think sometimes people forget this is a fan forum. Not an extension of the manufactures Warranty & Repair or Complaint department. At least it seems that way.

And in no small part due to the lack of an active company rep or mod, between the "fans" still PO'd about MAP, haters, agitator's and troll's, crap that wouldn't be tolerated for a minute in other sub forums is the norm here. I mean, We even have people regularly recommend or say what a better value other brands are in this sub forum?

Posting picture's of a QC issue being raised is the norm forum wide and is not unreasonable or unexpected.

I've been a fan and user since around 1997ish (give or take) and I guess I've been lucky too because I haven't experienced the total collapse in QC being suggested of late either.

These are production knives. They will have issues. Give me a lupe, a flashlight and a magnifying glass and I will find something wrong with any production knife. The question then becomes does it bother me enough to do something about it or is it a "real" issue, functional or cosmetic that requires repair. You can nit pick any production knife and find something wrong. Plus lemons do get threw. It does happen.

There have indeed been a lot of complaints about BM's QC of late. In fact I can tell you exactly when it started. Right after it became public that BM was going to start enforcing MAP, and then gave a less then satisfactory (frankly insulting) non explanation of it. Seems the reports of issues exploded after that.

I know people can and do have QC issues. (I've seen the pic's) No doubt about it, and I want to know about it too. But lets keep it honest and transparent. Asking for a picture of the problem being discussed is not out of line or too much to expect.

At least IMO.
 
As someone interested in the valet I want to hear about these things. Sure BM will take care of it but I don't want to spend money/time shipping a brand new knife back. There is no obligation for a person to let the company "make it right" before posting their experience with a new purchase as it came.
 
I think sometimes people forget this is a fan forum. Not an extension of the manufactures Warranty & Repair or Complaint department. At least it seems that way.

And in no small part due to the lack of an active company rep or mod, between the "fans" still PO'd about MAP, haters, agitator's and troll's, crap that wouldn't be tolerated for a minute in other sub forums is the norm here. I mean, We even have people regularly recommend or say what a better value other brands are in this sub forum?

Posting picture's of a QC issue being raised is the norm forum wide and is not unreasonable or unexpected.

I've been a fan and user since around 1997ish (give or take) and I guess I've been lucky too because I haven't experienced the total collapse in QC being suggested of late either.

These are production knives. They will have issues. Give me a lupe, a flashlight and a magnifying glass and I will find something wrong with any production knife. The question then becomes does it bother me enough to do something about it or is it a "real" issue, functional or cosmetic that requires repair. You can nit pick any production knife and find something wrong. Plus lemons do get threw. It does happen.

There have indeed been a lot of complaints about BM's QC of late. In fact I can tell you exactly when it started. Right after it became public that BM was going to start enforcing MAP, and then gave a less then satisfactory (frankly insulting) non explanation of it. Seems the reports of issues exploded after that.

I know people can and do have QC issues. (I've seen the pic's) No doubt about it, and I want to know about it too. But lets keep it honest and transparent. Asking for a picture of the problem being discussed is not out of line or too much to expect.

At least IMO.

There is certainly nothing wrong with pictures when a person is reviewing issues they had/have with a knife. Personally I think it is a little less important when the issue has already been complained about by others, and when the OP writes their review respectfully and isn't writing it to be malicious.
I think in the OP's case, he did his review respectfully. Still not sure why he didn't just repair the edge and keep it, but that is a decision only he can make.
 
Back
Top