- Joined
- Nov 17, 2006
- Messages
- 1,124
When I think of the makers who sell incredible folders in this price range (Hinderer, RJ Martin, Tighe, Lightfoot, Duncan, Lambert, Terzuola and Dozier if you add 50 bucks and that is just to name a few) why do people flock to production knives that cost as much? Is it the hassle of tracking down something like a Lambert Sniper, or that the productions are better advertised? Everytime I see someone recomend a Sebenez or simillar knife I cringe to think of buying one over a Dozier that cost 50 dollars more. First they lack the artistry of a Knife by a small maker. Not in design but in execution. If we do not value the people that can still do things by hand better than machines can acomplish they will diminish in numbers. Now I know that the makers in the folder field are not doing every part of the folder by hand, but they do alot. This comes across in fit and finish that a nice factory tries to emulate but will always fall short of in some respects. When you save $300 by buying a factory knife, I understand. When they are the same price, why on earth would you choose the factory piece? I bought a ZT302 recently and at $250 is the highest I have ever paid for a factory knife and I am very satisfied. But at $500 I would have gone after a HAVOC or even better saved $100 and got a XM-18. A Strider I can understand a bit as they are overbuilt but the XM-18 I just mentioned is a rugged work horse and costs less. So.... if you would choose the factory knife, please give some insight to why? (This topic came to mind reading a letter in Blade stating that the authore thought midtech was robbing new makers of there target market. I both agree and disagree with that article but I wondered about my stated topic for awhile.)