I dont have a 67 as I personally dislike tantos and recurves, plus I strongly prefer the usage of the titanium on the 42. Still, if the general construction of the 67 mirrors that of the 42, then it's a great knife and it is built to withstand the abuse a bali can see. And while I am no expert here by any means, I've never held a Benchmade Bali I thought was poor quality. Some I liked more than others due to my personal taste, but all were well-made tools that I have zero question to their build quality and capability.
One thing that divides a lot of bali owners is weight, and that often dictates if ti/aluminum or surgical stainless is a better handle material for them. Some people strongly prefer the heavier SS handles for flipping, so this being in SS handles may be an advantage if you like the additional weight. I personally think the BMs with the ti handles and stainless handles behave very, very differently to a point in which most people will probably ultimately prefer one over the other. The 'T' latch with spring is another people seem to be strongly preferable for or against.
I've done things to a 42 in 440C (most on accident) that are notorious for fracturing handles, locks, pins, screws, etc. I'm not sure if the hardware is titanium or just stainless, but it's durable and has serious impact strength.
So if the 67 uses the same hardware and the SS is good quality (which I bet it is), and has the same fit and finish of the 42, it's one serious awesome of a knife. My only complaint is that I wish BM would use a steel designed more for toughness than edge retention given balis are likely to be dropped and the blades have really fine-quality finishing. I've been holding out hope to see a production run bali in CPM-M4 given how much of a beating M4 can take...
