Both great knives... but they couldn't be more different, eh? I'd ask yourself: what's the main purpose for this purchase? What void to I need to fill in my collection -- and what role will I use this knife in most?
- If you're needing a gentleman-sized, pocket-friendly but fully-capable folder, 940 all the way.
- But if you want a no-holds barred workhorse (pocket-filling size be darned), 520!.
As others have said here and elsewhere, my 943 goes "out on the town" with me all the time. It's a true favorite... and I'm sure it can handle your camping tasks, too. But I never take mine camping. The blade is plenty long, but the handle is
so slender in all directions, I just can't see getting the leverage I'd like when tearing in to ... say... a log. And it's just too purdy to drop in the dirt.
If I'm camping or working around the house, I'd grab a much bigger handled beast, like the 520 (or in my case, my 950 Rift... or my ZT 300... or Spyderco PM2). For my tastes, that 520 handle is a touch thick for anything other than work pants -- for me, the 520 would be limited to weekend/evenings "EDC."
Oh heck, this is all academic. If you're like the rest of us, you'll buy both eventually.
