- Joined
- Aug 31, 2011
- Messages
- 3,070
I am sorry for the double post.
I designed this knife based on certain assumptions, the first one being that birds and trouts are not 500-pound beasts with hooves or horns. I was going for thinner and slicier. However, I am surprised there is not more flex in it, because I have made flexier knives.
Steel: 154CM treated by Peters' for 60HRC
Blade is 3 7/16"
Blade thickness is .103"
OAL is 7 1/2"
Handle is 1/2” thick at the thickest point, and tapers a bit toward the front.
What do you all think? Does it look like a good one to take fishing or bird hunting? Thank you in advance for constructive criticism, or glowing praise, or rhubarb pie recipes, or anything other than "You're an idiot."
--Andy
I designed this knife based on certain assumptions, the first one being that birds and trouts are not 500-pound beasts with hooves or horns. I was going for thinner and slicier. However, I am surprised there is not more flex in it, because I have made flexier knives.
Steel: 154CM treated by Peters' for 60HRC
Blade is 3 7/16"
Blade thickness is .103"
OAL is 7 1/2"
Handle is 1/2” thick at the thickest point, and tapers a bit toward the front.
What do you all think? Does it look like a good one to take fishing or bird hunting? Thank you in advance for constructive criticism, or glowing praise, or rhubarb pie recipes, or anything other than "You're an idiot."
--Andy

Last edited: