A great production Bowie?

MicroAlign

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2004
Messages
502
I know there are quite a few custom Bowie knife makers out there, but it seems that most of them are backlogged well over a year or more. So, I was wondering if someone can recommend be a good production Bowie knife.

I'm more concerned about the performance of the steel rather than whether it is stainless or not. I've thought about CPM-3V, but I don't think that any major manufacturers use it. I'd like it to be around a 9" blade, but I want it to be more of the classic Bowie style which has a decent enough point to it to be used for thrusting in defensive use.
 
The Bark River Rogue is a great production knife. It sports A2 steel, although it only has a 7" blade.
 
The various replicas of hiostoric Bowies by Paul Chen's Hanwei Works are very nice. I have one and like it a lot. So are the rather more massive Bowies by Generation 2 that Imperial Weapons sells. The current model, the Searles Bowie is quite a handsome and effective piece.
 
The Marbles Trailmaker is another big one that performs well. 10" blade, 15 1/2" overall.
 
Well, the Kentucky Bowie made by Linder was awarded in the outdoor category at IWA 2006.
440C @ 58HRc, so not quite the latest in steel fashion, but the knife definitely has style:

101020ge5.jpg

s19vx1.jpg
 
I have a CS Laredo and its been goods to me. No problems at all. Its nice lookin and has a big huge blade. However, my next knife purchase is going to be a Fallkniven Thor. If I had to do it over again, I'd probably would've just gone with the Thor.
 
Thanks for the advice so far everyone. I think I am going to go with a stain resistant blade. I'm willing to pay up to around $500, so I want the best I can get. So far, I am considering the Thor and CS's Trailmaster. So, which one is the best overall blade?
 
You might want to consider that the Thor has a thin, slicing edge. The Trailmaster edge is a bit thicker.



Quality goes to Fallkniven, though. As does the "feel in the hand" award.
 
The Thor is by no means thin, it is just thinner than the trailmaster, which is very thick. There is only a .03" difference in the blade thinkness. The thor also has the VG-10 core instead of the VG-1 or AUS 8, which ever one it is, that the trailmaster has. The thor is also slightly longer.
 
Back
Top