Hyperborean
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2005
- Messages
- 63
Hello,
I purchased a Manix a few days ago from a local dealer. I ordered it
via phone and got by mail service since this dealer is in another
city some 100 km away. Almost immediately after I opened the knife I
noticed that secondary bevel (edge's grind) is somewhat uneven and
significantly wider on the left side of the blade than on the right
side. On the right side is about 1 mm wide while on the left side the
width of the secondary bevel is almost 2 mm. Beside that the edge was
a bit blunted (it reflected light) at the tip,some 4 mm's in lenght
but this was maybe caused by someone at the store. Anyway that didn't
bothered me as much as the secondary bevels. I am not entirely happy
with the knife because of inprecisely executed secondary grind. I
expected higher standard in edge grinding from a company like
Spyderco and especially from a knife which is not the cheapest model.
Otherwise (minus a minor scratch on a clip) the knife gives a very
solid appearance and good ergonomics.
I would like to know if such significant difference in secondary
bevels grind is considered normal by Spyderco's standards?
Here are some photos of both secondary bevels and although the photos are not of good quality the difference can be easily noticed.
http://f7.yahoofs.com/users/44f68bd7zb5a4a8ef/2168re2/__sr_/7130re2.jpg?phIlDDFBDNkOUESN
http://f7.yahoofs.com/users/44f68bd7zb5a4a8ef/2168re2/__sr_/cef5re2.jpg?phIlDDFB0.2fRQJO
http://f7.yahoofs.com/users/44f68bd7zb5a4a8ef/2168re2/__sr_/5380re2.jpg?phIlDDFBx.uJVTZ.
I purchased a Manix a few days ago from a local dealer. I ordered it
via phone and got by mail service since this dealer is in another
city some 100 km away. Almost immediately after I opened the knife I
noticed that secondary bevel (edge's grind) is somewhat uneven and
significantly wider on the left side of the blade than on the right
side. On the right side is about 1 mm wide while on the left side the
width of the secondary bevel is almost 2 mm. Beside that the edge was
a bit blunted (it reflected light) at the tip,some 4 mm's in lenght
but this was maybe caused by someone at the store. Anyway that didn't
bothered me as much as the secondary bevels. I am not entirely happy
with the knife because of inprecisely executed secondary grind. I
expected higher standard in edge grinding from a company like
Spyderco and especially from a knife which is not the cheapest model.
Otherwise (minus a minor scratch on a clip) the knife gives a very
solid appearance and good ergonomics.
I would like to know if such significant difference in secondary
bevels grind is considered normal by Spyderco's standards?
Here are some photos of both secondary bevels and although the photos are not of good quality the difference can be easily noticed.
http://f7.yahoofs.com/users/44f68bd7zb5a4a8ef/2168re2/__sr_/7130re2.jpg?phIlDDFBDNkOUESN
http://f7.yahoofs.com/users/44f68bd7zb5a4a8ef/2168re2/__sr_/cef5re2.jpg?phIlDDFB0.2fRQJO
http://f7.yahoofs.com/users/44f68bd7zb5a4a8ef/2168re2/__sr_/5380re2.jpg?phIlDDFBx.uJVTZ.