Even 'simpler', less wear-resistant steels can be a pain to sharpen if the the grind behind the edge is thick and/or if the original edge angle is very wide. Anytime a lot of steel has to be ground off to attain decent cutting geometry, the going will be slower at the very least. Add to that, if the steel is also a softer, more ductile stainless (like AUS-XX types, 420/440-class steels, etc), you need to account for clogging of stones and staying ahead of that (lubricate the stone), and dealing with more burring issues as well. If a stone gets clogged with swarf from such steels, the progress slows exponentially. Newer, more modern wear-resistant steels at higher hardness won't usually present as much of that problem, which is one way they can actually be easier to sharpen than some would assume, especially if the right abrasives are used (diamond / cbn). Some high-wear steels can be stupid-simple to sharpen with the right choice of stone, and more so if the blade grind is nice & thin to start with and at a decent hardness to mitigate stubborn burring issues.
Seems like a lot of older knives I've seen in steels like AUS-6/8/10 etc were always pretty thick-edged to start with, as were a lot of knives of that era (1990s & earlier). That by itself often made them somewhat a hassle to get cutting really well. More makers these days are wising up to thinner grinds on factory blades, making them better cutters (even improving edge retention in going thinner) and much easier to make sharp and maintain them as such.
And I've seen some comparison between AUS-10 and 440C, both having (apparently) similar grain characteristics with fairly large chromium carbides. If the carbides are pretty big & chunky, like 440C's are, that sometimes tends to limit how fine the apex can get in sharpening. Newer CPM-grade steels utilize a finer particle metallurgy process, which makes the carbides much finer and more evenly distributed in the steel, making it both very wear-resistant and still easier to sharpen to a finer edge.