AK 12" vs 15"

Joined
Dec 18, 2006
Messages
210
Looks like I may never see my 12" AK again, so the time has come to purchase a new HI blade. My first instinct is to get another 12" AK, but there is the question of the 15" AK. For those who have both, does the extra 3" give the 15" a leg up over the 12"?
 
Absolutely. In my opinion, the extra length and weight change it from a knife to a khukuri.
 
Exactly what CT said.

I buy khuks to chop. Even the 15" is a little too small for my tastes. Starting at 16", that's a khuk to me. Want to guess whether a have, umm... several WWIIs?
 
Yeah, the 12" and 15" AK are totally different animals. It's the difference between a house cat and a wildcat. The 15" will handle just about any chopping chore that you might want to do, but the cost is the weight. Your knife will come in around 1.25-1.5lbs instead of 12-14oz. Personally, if I could only have one, I would go with a well honed 15" AK. However, given the choice of which one to pack on a hiking trip, the 12" AK wins hands down. There isn't much that MOST folks will need out of hiking/camp knife that the 12" AK can't deliver.
 
Depends on what you do with it. I have both + a couple others. When I'm knocking around the woods,the 15"AK goes 75% of the time.
Uplander
 
IMO if you want a 12" blade go for a Pen Knife, it out chops my 12" AK and is just as easy to carry while hiking or hunting. If you want something that is ot going to be carried alot go for the 15" AK or even the BAS.
 
The ang khola is usually about the thickest blade Himalayan Imports makes, I think--subject to the variation that any line of hand-made tools will have. You may very well find that you get maximum bang for your outdoor-supplies buck with a 15- or 16-inch khukuri with one of the not-so-thick blade designs. The BAS ends up being what I carry most--it's 15 inches overall, with a 10-inch blade; chops wood just fine for my little outdoor uses. If I were going to be chopping wood all day long to build semi-permanent outdoor shelters, chop down lots of trees, etc., I'm sure the bigger knives would do the job better--but in actual practice I'm more likely to build a fire or two, chop a few branches to use as a frame for a poncho-roofed lean-to, and then want to use my blade for finer cutting tasks, where a heavy 12- or 13-inch blade that's half an inch thick at the spine might be a bit too much of a good thing. That's why I like the BAS, sirupati, and Gelbu Special as much as I do. Sure, I love chiruwa ang kholas a lot, and have been getting them for each of my sons, liking the near-indestructibility of them. But for real utility, I have to admit that the BAS is the one I most often actually carry, and it doesn't suffer much in the way of even wood-chopping.
 
15" AK or BAS is a good woods knife - takes care of most chopping and splitting, while you have the small karda for fine work (although the kardas on the 15" models can be almost too small). If you want a more general utility knife, go with the 12"

I also agree with J.D. on the thickness issue. One of my favorite khuks was a thin, 18" AK by Bura. Even the thin khuks have more than enough meat to work.
 
Back
Top