AKTI - Knife Law Update - New Jersey

Joined
Oct 2, 1998
Messages
5,461
The Dilemma of Knife Definitions (in Pending U.S. State Legislation)

AKTI monitoring at least 14 states considering knife legislation
that would impact "carry" rules for knife owners

You're breaking the law! Or you're about to break the law! If you're a hunter, fisherman, hiker, biker, outdoorsperson of any sort, or just a plain old garden-variety American who happens to carry a knife in his pocket or purse, you're in grave danger of being "illegal" in your state, a neighboring state, or the state you're bound for.
If you were to travel across America from Alaska to Maine by car, law enforcement personnel in the state you enter might have serious questions about the knife you legally carried in the state you just left. And that's only in 14 states that AKTI has been monitoring since January 2002. (More states could get on the "questionable-knife-law" bandwagon after we wrote this in early April 2002.) The reality is that every state has its own knife laws that are often vastly different from laws in surrounding states.
The American Knife & Tool Institute currently monitors pending legislation and regulations in the 50 U.S. states through a service called StateNet. Member users of the AKTI website (www.akti.org) can access this service with a special password they can obtain by contacting Jan Billeb, AKTI Executive Director, at email: akti@akti.org. Go to the site. Check out your state's knife-law activity. AKTI pays more than $10,000 each year to make this service available to you. That's why we need individual "Ambassador" members (at only $35 per year) to make sure we can continue to provide this service. When you join AKTI, you help us continue to help you!
In some cases, AKTI hires lobbyists to provide direct input to lawmakers on behalf of individual knife owners and the entire industry. For example, the fight to save one-handers in California in 2000 and 2001 cost AKTI $50,000. We're currently involved in Florida where our lobbyist fees could total $15,000 for 2002. The battle to protect knife rights is virtually endless and can be very costly. Join AKTI today so we can continue to try to influence legislation before it becomes law (when it's almost impossible to change).
StateNet uses AKTI search criteria to pre-screen bills they believe would affect knife owners. A review of legislation they have spotlighted for us since January 1, 2002 shows a broad range of potentially harmful definitions of knives that could be used against you.
Let's start our imaginary trip from America's far northwest corner … in Alaska and end in the far northeast corner in Maine. We'll list the state, the bill number (date of introduction in parenthesis), the troublesome language of interest to our potential knife-owning traveler, then a brief comment. Just imagine if you were stopped in every state and your knives scrutinized, measured, perhaps declared illegal, and you were charged with a crime, perhaps jailed until you could post bail, your knives confiscated. The direct costs and emotional distress would be immense. That's why AKTI continues to press forward to both urge and to help lawmakers accurately, clearly and fairly write knife laws that protect responsible, law-abiding citizens.


New Jersey - S878 (2/11/02).
Revises New Jersey's firearm statutes to conform with federal Brady Law. Establishes some exemptions for persons carrying a firearm "or knife in the woods or fields or upon the waters of this State for the purpose of hunting, target practice or fishing, provided that the firearm or knife is legal and appropriate for hunting or fishing purposes in this State and he has in his possession a valid hunting license, or, with respect to fresh water fishing, a valid fishing license;…"
Comment: This bill makes some exceptions also for "transporting any firearm or knife while traveling" but our cross-country traveler better be careful. The sponsor of this bill clearly does not want any knife being carried in urban areas. Furthermore, "appropriate" (like "beauty") could very well be in the eyes of the beholder.
A1850 (2/21/02). Concerns ID cards for retired police officers who carry handguns. Uses the same "hunting and fishing" language as found in S878 (above).
S890 (2/11/02). Imposes restrictions on future retail sales of handguns. This bill would use the following definition of "weapon" as "anything readily capable of lethal use or of inflicting serious bodily injury. The term includes, but is not limited to, all … (3) gravity knives, switchblade knives, daggers, dirks, stilettos, or other dangerous knives,…" Comment: What is "dangerous?" Who decides?
 
Back
Top