- Joined
- Nov 3, 2019
- Messages
- 6
Folks,
I've got a head scratching request. My grandfather builds and competes model airplanes and with this he carves his own propellers out of balsa wood. For the past 30 years he's used a pretty typical wood carving knife with a blade length of around 4" that features a scandi grind. However, he has recently requested that I build him a similar knife that has some flex to it.
I've mulled this one over for a bit now and I've come to the conclusion that these two qualities in a knife are conflicting. It seems that flexible and aggressive are a difficult combination to achieve. My only thought is to use a thin stock (likely 5160) around 3/32 or under and "scandi grind" it resulting in a shallow primary bevel. The knife would have an unconventional appearance but the edge geometry should hold up still, and the stock thin enough that it has a bit of flex.. I think.
So... what do you think? Is this the right approach and if so, what thickness of stock should I be shooting for?
I've got a head scratching request. My grandfather builds and competes model airplanes and with this he carves his own propellers out of balsa wood. For the past 30 years he's used a pretty typical wood carving knife with a blade length of around 4" that features a scandi grind. However, he has recently requested that I build him a similar knife that has some flex to it.
I've mulled this one over for a bit now and I've come to the conclusion that these two qualities in a knife are conflicting. It seems that flexible and aggressive are a difficult combination to achieve. My only thought is to use a thin stock (likely 5160) around 3/32 or under and "scandi grind" it resulting in a shallow primary bevel. The knife would have an unconventional appearance but the edge geometry should hold up still, and the stock thin enough that it has a bit of flex.. I think.
So... what do you think? Is this the right approach and if so, what thickness of stock should I be shooting for?