Andrew Meers Mastersmith Test Knives Blade Show 2015

Joined
May 18, 2009
Messages
1,831
First off congratulations...Meers is one of my knifemaking heroes.

I've been dying to see his test knives and I just received these pictures so I'm sharing with you all.





















 
Last edited:
Very cool. What's the story with the secret compartments? Inquiring minds want to know.
 
hmmm, who's hair i wonder ? in the 1800's it was popular to wear a necklace locket with a lock of a loved one or someone specials hair. reminds me of that. the compartments are really cool and i like those menuki type things.
 
Andrew is pretty much at the top of my list. Not only is he intensely creative and educated in art, his skillset is pretty much unmatched in its range and capability.
 
What Lorien said. Best new MasterSmith award at Blade and well deserved. Compitition as tough as I have seen. Congrats to all.
 
I didn't know he won best new mastersmith. He didn't tell me that when I was talking to him. Humble master.
 
Yes, humble artist. I was fortunate to examine his dagger closely in Seattle. Award is for best dagger presented by a new MasterSmith. I would not have wanted to make that decision. All the new masters presented amazing work.
 
I love how dead serious his skills are along with his attention to detail...

Yet there is a fancifulness about the characters and designs that is warm, embracing, and counter balancing.

Yes, quite the artist.

Coop
 
I to got a good look at his Dagger at the Seattle show and my hart was full of joy for Andrew as soon as I saw it as I knew he would win the award for best knife in the room he put his hart and soul into this piece and it shows 10 fold.The hair is from his girl friend and the the words are from a pome he wrote for her. when I made my dagger i had hoped that it would be the best knife in the room I knew that Haley would bring her best and that pushed me even harder I think all 4 other dagger where very close but there was one clear stand out Dagger and it was Andrews a clear cut above the rest I am proud to have him as a class mate and can not wait to see what comes from his hands next.
 
Last edited:
All the new MS daggers are more than beautiful, but Meers one IMO has the perfect blade shape for the quillon dagger due to the slim, tapered profile, instead of almost parallel edges and more "broad" profile.
 
Got to take a peak of his work at the Seattle show. Top notch and absolutely innovative! That dagger - WOW. Totally humble in person as well.
 
J.D. Smith introduced me to Andrew probably 10 years ago at the OKCA show, and we just chatted about this work today.

IMO, the blade to handle ratio on the folders is unforgivably bad, and Andrew has heard it before.....he listens to his own song that one.

It WILL affect aftermarket value, severely damaging the ready sellability, but that doesn't make the art aspect of it any less impressive or beautiful. If the designs and desire connect between maker and collector, all is well.

Best Regards,

STeven Garsson
 
IMO, the blade to handle ratio on the folders is unforgivably bad...
It WILL affect aftermarket value, severely damaging the ready sellability

and yet his folder claimed 'Best Folder' at the Seattle show....:confused:

I have seen a great many brilliantly conceived folders from top tier makers, made from top shelf materials, that have as much blade in that handle as possible...commanding very little- sitting unbought on dealer's sites, priced at 1/2, or less, of what you'd think they should be. Makers with decades of history in the craft, and whose names grace 10s of 1000s of production knives. Beautiful knives sitting there, undesired, that once commanded top dollar, and made to a formula for success. At the time.

I'm glad for all our sakes that Andrew listens to his own song. I strongly disagree that doing so displays anything unforgivable or severely damaging to him, or to collectors of his work.
 
and yet his folder claimed 'Best Folder' at the Seattle show....:confused:

I have seen a great many brilliantly conceived folders from top tier makers, made from top shelf materials, that have as much blade in that handle as possible...commanding very little- sitting unbought on dealer's sites, priced at 1/2, or less, of what you'd think they should be. Makers with decades of history in the craft, and whose names grace 10s of 1000s of production knives. Beautiful knives sitting there, undesired, that once commanded top dollar, and made to a formula for success. At the time.

I'm glad for all our sakes that Andrew listens to his own song. I strongly disagree that doing so displays anything unforgivable or severely damaging to him, or to collectors of his work.

You strongly disagree because you don't take a total picture into account when you make statements. Your exposure to the big picture is limited. You have been to what, three knife shows in person, maybe 4?

By my second year of collecting in the mid 80's, I had more direct experience with shows and makers in person than you have had up until now.

You are a nice guy and you have a lot of idealism, and that is a really awesome thing for the knife world....we need that! Just don't confuse passion for knowledge.

William James McHenry is a knifemaker from Rhode Island. He really splashed onto the scene in the mid-90's. He came out to the Oregon Knife Collector's show in maybe 1994 or 1995, While there, he struck up a relationship with Benchmade that resulted in the Benchmade 710 Axis Lock, and later, the only solid OTF that has given Microtech a run for their money up until this point, with the Infidel. He is what many knowledgable people call the Father of the New England Bladesmithing School. Bill was also very big on getting as much blade in the handle as possible. It was doctrine for him.

After coming to the OKCA show, there came to be a knife show in Providence, Rhode Island the following year, and Bill played official host to a motley crew of makers and collectors at his home and forge. People stayed for a few days, and on Monday, there was a class that Bill held. In attendance were Bill McHenry and Jason Williams teaching and students Steve Hill, Bill Saindon, J.D. Smith and Ralph Selvedio. I was allowed to hang out on my own and practice hand engraving, which I suck at....but learned it at Bill's.

The importance of blade-to-handle ratio was discussed there and emphasized.

J.D. taught Andrew Meers how to build knives and how to make damascus as far as I know. For Andrew to consciously reject a FUNCTIONAL element that was so emphasized is more than slightly insulting to those that came before him that taught him better. This is willfulness in spades, and not necessarily a virtue.

There are not that many folder makers that attended the Seattle Show last year, not sure about this year....the competition for Best Chef's knife was of a much higher level last year.

I can tell you that it would not have taken Best Folder at Blade.

Andrew is a very likeable person and very talented, Lorien. You feel free to write what you feel from your experiences and I'll write from mine. I would LIKE Andrew to be a top tier maker, but the competition is tough at the top and only he can decide if that is something that matters to him.

All the new MS daggers are more than beautiful, but Meers one IMO has the perfect blade shape for the quillon dagger due to the slim, tapered profile, instead of almost parallel edges and more "broad" profile.

I found the quillons to be too thin and too wide in relation to the blade width. the piece I really enjoy is the utility in damascus with the golden overlay, and is that snakewood? Anyway, that is a very cool piece, and one that I would like to own.

Best Regards,

STeven Garsson
 
Last edited:
I agree with Steven for the most part. I have heard nothing but good things about Andrew and I see his skill set shining through.. but through work that doesn't attract me. One thing for sure is I bet each knife has a deep story.

Looking again, there is some real cool stuff going on in those knives and I could sit there and stare at it a while, but not something I would spend money on. Just a taste thing for me as I'm not qualified to discuss the market.. ;)

I should also add that I do like the looks of the kitchen knife more then I realized. I like ladybugs too. :) Thats a nice knife and more up my alley.
 
Last edited:
So, there are tons of knives (fixed blades) where the handle is longer than the blade...and it's made on purpose!!
But when it come to a folding knife it becomes a major issue, like as sticking a longer blade into it would appear this much of a challenge...for a mastersmith!!!
I tell you a secret: it is not this difficult, it's just a choice.
 
You strongly disagree because you don't take a total picture into account when you make statements. Your exposure to the big picture is limited. You have been to what, three knife shows in person, maybe 4?

By my second year of collecting in the mid 80's, I had more direct experience with shows and makers in person than you have had up until now.

You are a nice guy and you have a lot of idealism, and that is a really awesome thing for the knife world....we need that! Just don't confuse passion for knowledge.

William James McHenry is a knifemaker from Rhode Island. He really splashed onto the scene in the mid-90's. He came out to the Oregon Knife Collector's show in maybe 1994 or 1995, While there, he struck up a relationship with Benchmade that resulted in the Benchmade 710 Axis Lock, and later, the only solid OTF that has given Microtech a run for their money up until this point, with the Infidel. He is what many knowledgable people call the Father of the New England Bladesmithing School. Bill was also very big on getting as much blade in the handle as possible. It was doctrine for him.

After coming to the OKCA show, there came to be a knife show in Providence, Rhode Island the following year, and Bill played official host to a motley crew of makers and collectors at his home and forge. People stayed for a few days, and on Monday, there was a class that Bill held. In attendance were Bill McHenry and Jason Williams teaching and students Steve Hill, Bill Saindon, J.D. Smith and Ralph Selvedio. I was allowed to hang out on my own and practice hand engraving, which I suck at....but learned it at Bill's.

The importance of blade-to-handle ratio was discussed there and emphasized.

J.D. taught Andrew Meers how to build knives and how to make damascus as far as I know. For Andrew to consciously reject a FUNCTIONAL element that was so emphasized is more than slightly insulting to those that came before him that taught him better. This is willfulness in spades, and not necessarily a virtue.

There are not that many folder makers that attended the Seattle Show last year, not sure about this year....the competition for Best Chef's knife was of a much higher level last year.

I can tell you that it would not have taken Best Folder at Blade.

Andrew is a very likeable person and very talented, Lorien. You feel free to write what you feel from your experiences and I'll write from mine. I would LIKE Andrew to be a top tier maker, but the competition is tough at the top and only he can decide if that is something that matters to him.



I found the quillons to be too thin and too wide in relation to the blade width. the piece I really enjoy is the utility in damascus with the golden overlay, and is that snakewood? Anyway, that is a very cool piece, and one that I would like to own.

Best Regards,

STeven Garsson

So you've managed to cheapen his best folder award at Seattle by saying there wasn't much competition and state that his blade to handle ratio on his folder insults the people that have taught him how to make knives....

Personally I think it's some of the best I've ever seen but I've only been to 6 knife shows and a Virgil England exhibition.

And I highly doubt insult is what JD feels when he sees Meers' work.
 
You DO realize there's a reason why the handle is comparatively long, right? A FUNCTIONAL reason.
Or perhaps some are blinded by doctrine

Ps. I was trying to say, in my previous post, that I had a problem with the way the post I was referring to was worded, and the implications carried with that wording.
I posted this message, without due consideration to how it muddied the point I had tried to make previously. It's still a fair point, and a response to an argument made, but not really pertinent to what I was saying.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top