greetings and salutations once more dear fellow forumites.
i'm getting into bowhunting and have asked a few questions about a knife (or two) to take out with me. i'm thinking something in the 6"-8" range as a "sticker, finisher and all around big-blade" and something in the 4" range as a "skinner, dresser, dismemberer and general camp duties blade".
i've looked around the intarweb a lot and have a question:
Laminated Steel blades: are they really that much better than a single-steel blade that justifies the extra cost?
i'm not averse to spending decent money on my blades so long as i'm getting value for that extra cash. my motto has always been: There Is An Economy In Quality.
for the 6"-8"er, i'm currently debating about getting a cold steel recon tanto (~AUD$130 inc shipping), which i can afford pretty much immediatly. or save up and get a Fallkniven NL2 "Odin" (~AUD$420'ish).
for the ~4"er, the Fallkniven NL5 "Idun" (~AUD$270) looks like a pretty perfect fit, but again, it's very pricey or i'm also looking at the RAT Izula (~AUD$140), except the Izula with it's 3" blade might be a little short for my intended usage.
if i do decide to go with the Fallkniven blades, is it fair to assume i'm buying a couple of Heirloom Pieces? (eg: will my grandkids be using these blades once i'm dead and gone?).
i already own a couple of seriously sweet (and 50+ years old) Swedish made carving blades (i'm led to believe they were made in Esktilstuna), so i'm well aware that the Swedes know a thing or two about knifemaking.
from a purely personal, aesthetic perspective, i rekon the Fallkniven's are by far the better looking blades. i also have a bit of a thing for the good old stacked leather handles.
so, who's going to convince me to shell out the extra $$$?
(in other words: who's got a really good argument for splashing out?)
i'm getting into bowhunting and have asked a few questions about a knife (or two) to take out with me. i'm thinking something in the 6"-8" range as a "sticker, finisher and all around big-blade" and something in the 4" range as a "skinner, dresser, dismemberer and general camp duties blade".
i've looked around the intarweb a lot and have a question:
Laminated Steel blades: are they really that much better than a single-steel blade that justifies the extra cost?
i'm not averse to spending decent money on my blades so long as i'm getting value for that extra cash. my motto has always been: There Is An Economy In Quality.
for the 6"-8"er, i'm currently debating about getting a cold steel recon tanto (~AUD$130 inc shipping), which i can afford pretty much immediatly. or save up and get a Fallkniven NL2 "Odin" (~AUD$420'ish).
for the ~4"er, the Fallkniven NL5 "Idun" (~AUD$270) looks like a pretty perfect fit, but again, it's very pricey or i'm also looking at the RAT Izula (~AUD$140), except the Izula with it's 3" blade might be a little short for my intended usage.
if i do decide to go with the Fallkniven blades, is it fair to assume i'm buying a couple of Heirloom Pieces? (eg: will my grandkids be using these blades once i'm dead and gone?).
i already own a couple of seriously sweet (and 50+ years old) Swedish made carving blades (i'm led to believe they were made in Esktilstuna), so i'm well aware that the Swedes know a thing or two about knifemaking.
from a purely personal, aesthetic perspective, i rekon the Fallkniven's are by far the better looking blades. i also have a bit of a thing for the good old stacked leather handles.
so, who's going to convince me to shell out the extra $$$?
(in other words: who's got a really good argument for splashing out?)