14C28N has very good corrosion resistance for a non-salt steel, but it's no match for LC200N, and will definitely rust when exposed to seawater.
My question would be how long does it take for each steel to develop corrosion upon contact.
I’m no metallurgist, and I don’t have a ton of experience with testing these steels, but from the data I’ve read from people who are metallurgists, Vanax is at the top, followed by H1, and then LC200N, Nitrobe 77, and M390. And then supposedly 14C28N is next in line.
Vanax and Nitrobe 77 aren’t really popular enough that I would consider them viable options for most people to use in saltwater situations, and H1 supposedly needs incredibly frequent sharpening, so that leaves LC200N, M390, and 14C28N as the front runners (in my opinion).
I was actually surprised to learn that M390 is so close to LC200N and higher than 14C28N.
I would personally consider all three as options myself for saltwater use, as I wouldn’t leave my knives for the multiple hours all three of these steels might require to rust.
The variable I saw was that LC200N remained almost corrosion free even after long durations of exposure (eight hours +).
So yes, what I learned definitely supports your statement that other steels will definitely rust, but I think it makes a significant difference if a knife rusts after ten minutes or five hours. I.E. both will “definitely rust”, but one can be used for multiple hours at a time with no issue.
Do you have personal experience with these steels that might suggest something different? (I’m not meaning that sarcastically at all. I hate text for communicating things like this.)
Also, I think price would factor into my personal decision, as I can choose between so many more knives in M390 and 14C28N than LC200N, which I think tends to have a disproportionately high price point for what you get.