They have similar corrosion resistance. D2 has better abrasive wear resistance than 3V in a knife edge (despite what Crucible says) and an inherently toothy edge that cuts hide and meat even when blunted. 3V has better edge stability and better toughness, which means better edge retention in rough use, but in "normal" use you'll find the D2 stays sharp longer, particularly in abrasive materials, making it a good fit for a small thin knife. And although D2 is not as tough as 3V, you'll find it's more durable than most of the stainless steels you may have experience with. It's a great all around steel, particularly for a small knife that will see a lot of use. You'll be amazed how well it holds an edge.
The biggest down side to D2 is reduced edge stability due to the large amount of carbide and retained austenite, which necessitated a cutlery specific heat treat for good performance in a knife. If you've ever used a D2 knife that didn't hold an edge as well as you thought it should, it probably has the industry standard HT which was developed for stamping tools that minimizes distortion and risk of cracking and dimensional changes, but doesn't work in a knife. Learning to get the most out of D2 taught me a lot about edge stability that I applied later to 3V.
Interestingly, I feel the conventional D2 works better than the PM D2. I'm using Crucible steel, but not their CPM version. I didn't do this as a cost savings (amounts to ~$1 per blade difference) I did this because the larger carbides in conventional electric arc melt steel don't fall out of the edge like the small rounded carbides in the CPM version and allow it to stay sharp longer in real use in a knife edge.