The drawing of the top profile shows that the cheeks are very fat. Is this a good or bad thing?
3/4 inch thick just forward of the eye then tapering to the edge. I wouldn't call that fat and yes it's a good thing on this axe.
There is more metal forward of the eye before the taper to the cutting edge when compared to axes of traditional design.
The packaging, drawing,and photographs don't properly show the overall feel of this axe. It is a slim axe when compared to other wooden or polymer handled axes I own near this size.
The axe and handle combination is balanced well and has good swing balance both vertically and horizontally. The handle
takes some getting used to. I think it needs to be stiffer because there is to much dimensional flex. I am wondering if the handle material was chosen for game cleaning aspects, making it easier to wipe off and sterilize when compared to wood.
After a little more use mostly kindling splitting of already quartered pieces of logs I am starting to like it and upgrading my assessment to Not Bad.
While splitting some small pieces I got stuck and couldn't get any bite or split on a piece. So I switched to my next size up axe and it also had a hard time and got stuck and didn't bite but eventually split it. So that made me not blame the axe.
One thing I want to mention is if your looking for a heavy duty slobberknocker brute of an axe this isn't it. This one is more light tackle gear.
It has a spot in my lineup and when kayaking this one will go especially in saltwater.
In the $40.00 new category the only other comp I can think of is the mighty Estwing camper axe, which I like for different reasons. We shall see if it passes the test of time, I know my Collins Old Timer has
