- Joined
- May 16, 2006
- Messages
- 615
I've got a chance to buy a BK2 and BK9 that are both new, old stock Camillus models. They are both NIB with all papers, and represented to be purchased from Camillus' auction that liquidated all their assets before they closed their doors in late '07. The only thing "special" about these knives is that they are both from Camillus' early production runs after taking over from Blackjack(? right ?), as evidenced by both of them having leather sheaths. Now, I like the sheaths better in both cases than what comes with these knives now, but that is not a deciding factor for me. I don't buy my knives because of the sheath they come with.
My only question is about the quality between Camillus and Ka-Bar. My BK9 is Camillus and I don't have a single complaint about it. However, all of my criteria is completely user-based, and I don't have a clue about what differences in manufacturing processes might exist, and if any, how they might adversely affect the quality of the blade. I'm thinking heat treating here, or steel alloys, stuff like that.
I already have two BK2s, both of which are Ka-Bars, and I don't have any complaints about them either. BUT, I haven't used either of them hardly at all. (I know, time to get out and use 'em! I'm making plans for that as we type.)
So what say y'all? I'm not really looking at the potential purchase for any collector value. The "value" in a knife for me comes in how useful it is. I'm just asking if y'all have any preferences that revolve around build quality between the two manufacturers?
BTW, the prices of the two blades are close enough to current prices of the modern versions as to not be really relevant to my decision.
Thanks.
Blues
My only question is about the quality between Camillus and Ka-Bar. My BK9 is Camillus and I don't have a single complaint about it. However, all of my criteria is completely user-based, and I don't have a clue about what differences in manufacturing processes might exist, and if any, how they might adversely affect the quality of the blade. I'm thinking heat treating here, or steel alloys, stuff like that.
I already have two BK2s, both of which are Ka-Bars, and I don't have any complaints about them either. BUT, I haven't used either of them hardly at all. (I know, time to get out and use 'em! I'm making plans for that as we type.)
So what say y'all? I'm not really looking at the potential purchase for any collector value. The "value" in a knife for me comes in how useful it is. I'm just asking if y'all have any preferences that revolve around build quality between the two manufacturers?
BTW, the prices of the two blades are close enough to current prices of the modern versions as to not be really relevant to my decision.
Thanks.
Blues