- Joined
- Apr 14, 2006
- Messages
- 7,021
Title says it all.
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
Title says it all.
Two completely different blade types. There is no comparison.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Somebody sell me a cincin bk4 and ill do the comparison.
Although I have to agree with rick. Different blades, no comparison needed.
I disagree. They are both primarily designed as choppers.
Doc
Bladite hasn't tried the BK20 yet?!?![]()
Bladite has to buy his own, and life has been pretty hectic lately (new job! training! other fun things!)... lots of yard work, and clearing when i have the time...
probably the North East gathering will be my chance. hell, maybe i'll win a couple![]()
IMO The Bk20 is a very aggressive big badass becker that bites hard the cinci as the Bk4 a very good chopper with less weight and shorter blade more user friendly on long task, sorry about the Shit photos but raining here so both the camera and lack of time only a few shots of how they bite a Maple Log
The Bk20 Bites deep only comparison would be The Kukri IMO
Yes, and no. The Machax is an all purpose woods tool, and the 20 was designed as more of a jungle machete. The 4 is MUCH more utilitarian than the 20, but the 20 is much more powerful than the 4. Experienced hands will love both. Inexperienced hands will love the 20 more. Doc, I'd say you'd still take your 4 over it.
First of all, nutoknives, thanks for taking the time to do that.
Is that a Cinci or a Camillus?
I get your point Rick, but since I'm a little short on jungle, my interest is how they chop up here in hardwood country. Actually, I think I could write a comparison without having handled the 20. I would think the 20 would bite deeper due to weight and length. I'm just curious how much better. For small knife tasks, I would think the Cinci 4 would have the advantage. For me, the Cinci also has, as Bladite pointed out above, a size and weight advantage - much more compact and light weight for hauling around. There's one other advantage of the Cinci 4 and that is it has a much stouter tip which would have served me well the other day, trying to pry out some fatwood. Someone posted a picture comparing the tips on the 20 and the 2 and the 2 was much thicker. The Cinci is much thicker than the 2, at least the first generation 2.
And, of course you're right - I am hugely biased towards the Cinci.
I guess what I'm really trying to do is talk myself out of spending almost $300 (Canada-US exchange rates and shipping). I have no doubt the 20 is a first class blade, and a joy to own but a bit pricey for us Canucks. I know, it comes with a Kabar 4 and a 5 but I already have 3 BK-4s - 1 Cinci, 1 Kabar stamped, and 1 Kabar etched and for the next while BK-4s will be selling dirt cheap. A shame really, because it really is an excellent design.
Anyway, thanks everyone for replying to my thread.
Doc