- Joined
- Aug 30, 2008
- Messages
- 3,214
I recently picked up a Nilakka by Spyderco, maker of "Reliable High Performance" knives.
I think it's a fabulous design and love the handle. Often on knives in general, and folders especially, the handle is designed after the blade, sometimes they seem like an afterthought. Not so with the Nilakka. This knife has a real handle and one might almost guess the blade was designed after the handle. Brilliant. I really like the brown G-10, understated & not the usual tactiblack, almost woodsy.
And who can complain about S30V steel for a folder's edge? The blade is thin and narrows nicely to a needle-like point. Should be a very efficient slicer.
I was curious to note, however, that this Spydie came with a small card with fine print warning that the knife is "not intended for hard-use cutting chores". It further states that any such use could be construed as "intentional abuse", voiding the Spyderco warranty.
Thanks for the warning, but that's a bit disappointing to read. I'm pretty careful with my knives and I'd like to think I don't "abuse" them, but a puukko is a traditional woods knife. A hunting and fishing tool. I'm sure for some Finns a survival tool. And I'm wondering if form followed form or function?
So, I'm curious, has anyone broken their Nikkala? And, if so, how?
I think it's a fabulous design and love the handle. Often on knives in general, and folders especially, the handle is designed after the blade, sometimes they seem like an afterthought. Not so with the Nilakka. This knife has a real handle and one might almost guess the blade was designed after the handle. Brilliant. I really like the brown G-10, understated & not the usual tactiblack, almost woodsy.
And who can complain about S30V steel for a folder's edge? The blade is thin and narrows nicely to a needle-like point. Should be a very efficient slicer.
I was curious to note, however, that this Spydie came with a small card with fine print warning that the knife is "not intended for hard-use cutting chores". It further states that any such use could be construed as "intentional abuse", voiding the Spyderco warranty.
Thanks for the warning, but that's a bit disappointing to read. I'm pretty careful with my knives and I'd like to think I don't "abuse" them, but a puukko is a traditional woods knife. A hunting and fishing tool. I'm sure for some Finns a survival tool. And I'm wondering if form followed form or function?
So, I'm curious, has anyone broken their Nikkala? And, if so, how?
Last edited: