Originally posted by Dan Harden
anything else unsightly has NOTHING to do with hand made VS CNC work. It is just sloppy workmanship.........period.
.... Ever seen a Japanese sword? From start to finish with out a machine touching it? There is no machine finish that can match it..NONE.....
You make several good points.
At the same time you fail to address the details on both ends.
At the extremes,
a traditional Japanese-made sword of this quality is typically made
by at least three specialists (smith, refiner-polisher, 'fitting-smith')
who spend -long- hours on each blade knowing it will be
appreciated as both art & weapon,
and that it will be sold at a premium.
Made by one smith, the same hours are involved.
I'll bring up the 80/20 'rule' (round-figure concept here);
the last 20% of the result takes 80% of the time/effort/$/etc.
The khukuri is made by a smith who is trying to put food on the table
AND
-cannot- spend hours looking for the last scratch in the blade.
The kamis put 80% of their effort into producing a servicable blade,
& only 20% into pretty-ing it.
As you point out, it's a tool.
I've no doubt that if we wanted to spend $1000 or more for a khukuri,
that they could afford to spend the hours -just- to refine the
blade geometry, polish & fittings to criteria approaching
Japanese master smiths.
But then too, I wouldn't have even one khuk.
Yes,
"perfection" is practicable,
you are right,
absolutely & undeniably;
in some situations.
I still admire my khuks & the kamis that made them.
I will still say these are 'master' smiths
who turn out masterful products.
Your use of "sloppy workmanship" is where I
find disagreement with your comments.
Time is the bottom line.
This is not a fault of the kamis or anyone else.
To call them sloppy is to cast aspersions.
Be well.