Anyone HT SS Bolsters ?

Joined
Nov 29, 2011
Messages
1,396
So I have not scene very much about this and was reading on Jay Fishers site he mentions using 304 vice 440c or similar and a few of his reasons dealt with it maintaining its stainless qualities and is really tough.

So I was wondering why not just heat treat the 440c stainless (or whatever stainless you use on bolsters). I am not sure maybe alot of you guys do or its just not economical/feasable with respect to finishing the bolsters once on the knife and such.

Thanks for any info and opinions.

Oh and this is not a thread intended to be about Fisher knives or his work or what not, just reading info and trying to grasp more reasons for certain stuff.
 
I used to buy heat treated 416 stainless for guards. I think Sheffield used to sell it. I really couldn't tell much difference in the heat treated 416 stainless and the un heat treated 416 stainless.
 
I have heard that heat treating 416 makes it more stain resistant. I don't think it will get any harder than the mid to high 40's using normal methods, but I may be wrong.
I used to buy heat treated 416 stainless for guards. I think Sheffield used to sell it. I really couldn't tell much difference in the heat treated 416 stainless and the un heat treated 416 stainless.
 
I heat treat 416 for bolsters. It does harden to low 40s. Makes the bolsters more scratch resistant and takes a better shine IMO. Since I have an Evenheat, it is easy to do while HT blades.
Chip Kunkle
 
I'm pretty sure the main reason would be scratch-resistance. If you plan to have the bolsters engraved, that's not necessarily a good thing.
 
I heat treat 416 for bolsters. It does harden to low 40s. Makes the bolsters more scratch resistant and takes a better shine IMO. Since I have an Evenheat, it is easy to do while HT blades.
Chip Kunkle


Chip,

Could you share your heat treat info for 416? And do you think this would also work for 410?

Thanks in advance
 
Back
Top