Anyone use a Kellam Tracker for Bushcraft?

I researched this knife quite a bit and had it on my consideration list, but it got bumped for two smaller models: the Fang and the Wolverine.

The more I learn about knives, the more I prefer blades under 4 inches in length for their dexterity.

I haven't found any reviews of the Tracker online, but there are some user pics on other forums that you can look up for size comparison at least.

If you know you'd like the blade length of the Tracker, then I'd say go for it. It looks like a great knife with a very comfortable handle.
 
My plan is to match it with the Kellam Prowler which has a 2.8in blade. that way I have a long and short blade.


RickJ
 
i "had" the tracker and sold it... great knife but imo its a little too big
take my advice and go with fang model with the 4.7" blade
 
Jaiofspam said:
i "had" the tracker and sold it... great knife but imo its a little too big
take my advice and go with fang model with the 4.7" blade
Click to expand...

+1 on the "Fang". I also have the "Wolverine". Both are great knives.
 
Wolverine all the way. I had the tracker, but while it made a great skinner, the blade was to wide to carve with..something I think is important in this style of knife.
 
I have a Wolverine that I recently convexed. It is now one of the best slicing carving knives I own. The knife is good looking, doesnt draw too much attention when carried and used, cuts like a laser and holds that edge well. My only complaint is that I like a little larger blade. I recently made a five inch scandi grind blade that I am currently proofing. Really liking this size. Just my two pennies worth.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top