Point44 said:
You can't compare a normal person to Terri Schiavo. She's bedridden and was without WATER and food. Without water a normal human being can barely last 3 days. Without food the body can last for months. So as long as you've got some water that should be alright in an emergency. You really underestimate the capability of the human body. We've got lots of reserve energy in our body that kicks in when we're in a survival situation.
Thank for reiterating what I'd said. She died after almost two weeks (a fortnight for those who speak older English...) after her feeding tube was removed and hydration was taken away. So, she lived longer than she should have, without water, but, she died sooner than if mere starvation had taken her.
Point44 said:
What i'm trying to say is having food for 3 days of emergency isn't good enough. A normal person can EASILY fast for 3 days without food in a survival situation (but has to take water). Of course then comes the question of how much food you need to stock up? 3 days? 2 weeks?
I agree that three days isn't enough, and that's why I think that I have a thirty day supply, just counting my water. I believe that I also have a commensurate amount of food in my pantry.
Point44 said:
So where do you stop? What are you going to do when your food runs out? Stand in line like the others? You're only delaying the inevitable.
Just as eating also delays the inevitability of death through starvation?

I don't have a "lifetime" supply of food and water, but I'm hoping that whatever 'emergency' might occur doesn't last longer than the supplies I have.
Point44 said:
The situation of having to take a 30 mile hike is just absurd. Where are you going? When are you planning to take the hike? After 3 days after all your food is gone? Since you said you can't travel then what are you doing hiking for 30 miles? Who's going to carry the gallons of water? Will your children be hiking with you for 30 miles?
You think that a 30-mile hike is absurd? Really? Well, if I need to walk to where my parents live, that would actually require a forty mile hike, but I don't see it as being "absurd," in whichever viewpoint I want to take. What if my car doesn't have the gasoline for the drive? That would necessitate making a hike. What if the roads travelling to my destination are blocked? That means leaving the car behind and hiking.
Of course, if I *had* to make the hike, I'd choose to do it while I was fully fed and hydrated. If I had the choice of when to make the hike, I'd start hiking when I had three days of food and water remaining. If I had to hike thirty miles after running out of food and water, then I don't know if I could do it. . o O (Pictures of the Bataan Death March floating through my head...)
If I'm staying here, where I live, then hiking shouldn't be necessary, anytime. But, if the hordes of thugs are leaving downtown, like rats leaving a sinking ship, should I stay here, awaiting them? At some point during an emergency, if it's severe enough, there will be a breakdown in Law & Order, or there will be a lack of people enforcing the law, so leaving wouldn't be that much of a difficulty.
Thankfully, I don't yet have any children that would have to go through an emergency.
If an emergency comes, I can load up all of my food and water and take it with me, in that time period when travelling isn't prohibited with a "shoot to kill" order. If I have to hike out, no, I couldn't carry everything with me.
Point44 said:
Of course having food around will make you comfortable. I'm just saying that in a real emergency you can go without food easily for 3 days. So having 3 days worth of food won't really bring your survival chances up that much.
Starvation, or the starting on that path, isn't in my plans. I guess that some people can think that they'll be fine without food and water for three days, until they can find another source for food and water, but I'm not that kind of a gambler. I think that I have a thirty-day supply of each, and maybe more, with judicious rationing.
Point44 said:
The best solution of all is to grow your own food in your house. Have chickens outside and grow vegetables. That way you'll be self sufficient for an indefinite period of time.
Then, the best solution would be to have farming as one's profession.
GeoThorn